1994
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)90509-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates of pelvic measurements and birth weight in beef heifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on females between 24 months (first parity) and 48 months (third parity and mature) and males between 18 and 24 months (slaughtering age) the development of separate models for males and females should be considered. Gender significantly influences pelvic sizes (this study) and age influences variation of the pelvic size (this study; Glaze et al, 1994). When measuring TcTc, a clear distinction must be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Focusing on females between 24 months (first parity) and 48 months (third parity and mature) and males between 18 and 24 months (slaughtering age) the development of separate models for males and females should be considered. Gender significantly influences pelvic sizes (this study) and age influences variation of the pelvic size (this study; Glaze et al, 1994). When measuring TcTc, a clear distinction must be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1993), as do the body conformation traits and weight at birth (Table 3; Anderson et al. 1993; Glaze et al. 1994; Arthur et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Burfening et al (1978) and Hanset (1981) prefer selection using calving ease scores, selection for less dystocia and fewer CSs in the DM-BBB can only be performed by increasing internal pelvic sizes of the dam and by lowering the weight and/or size of the newborn calf. Internal pelvic sizes have a high heritability (Morrison et al 1986;Anderson et al 1993), as do the body conformation traits and weight at birth (Table 3; Anderson et al 1993;Glaze et al 1994;Arthur et al 1997), making this approach possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pelvic dimensions were reported to be highly heritable traits (h 2 , 0.15–0.68; Morrison et al, 1986; Glaze et al, 1994), and cattle breeders had preference for cows of higher pelvimetric values to circumvent incidences of dystocia. Higher pelvic dimensions had some better roles to play in cows to avoid parturition difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%