2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for growth traits in Boer goat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
50
11
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
28
50
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderate estimate of direct heritability suggests further scope for improvement due to selection in the flock for higher birth weight. Our h 2 estimate for BWT was in accordance with the estimates obtained by using simple animal model (model 1) by Al-Shorepy et al (2002) for Emirati goats (0.30), Rashidi et al (2008) for Markhoz goats (0.35±0.04), Zhang et al (2008) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06), Kantanamalakul et al (2008) for mixed goat population (0.30±0.04) and Zhang et al (2009) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06). Current Estimate is higher than reports by Yalcin et al (1989) and Gerstmayr and Horst (1995) in Angora goats (0.00 and 0.02), Schoeman et al (1997) for Boer goats (0.16), Mugambi et al (2007) in the Kenya dual-purpose goats (0.13), Boujenane and El Hazzab (2008) for Draa goats (0.16), Roy et al (2008) for Jamunapari goats (0.12), Shaat and Maki-Tanila (2009) for Zairabi goats (0.10), and Maghsoudi et al (2009) for Iranian Cashmere goats (0.20).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moderate estimate of direct heritability suggests further scope for improvement due to selection in the flock for higher birth weight. Our h 2 estimate for BWT was in accordance with the estimates obtained by using simple animal model (model 1) by Al-Shorepy et al (2002) for Emirati goats (0.30), Rashidi et al (2008) for Markhoz goats (0.35±0.04), Zhang et al (2008) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06), Kantanamalakul et al (2008) for mixed goat population (0.30±0.04) and Zhang et al (2009) for Boer goats (0.30±0.06). Current Estimate is higher than reports by Yalcin et al (1989) and Gerstmayr and Horst (1995) in Angora goats (0.00 and 0.02), Schoeman et al (1997) for Boer goats (0.16), Mugambi et al (2007) in the Kenya dual-purpose goats (0.13), Boujenane and El Hazzab (2008) for Draa goats (0.16), Roy et al (2008) for Jamunapari goats (0.12), Shaat and Maki-Tanila (2009) for Zairabi goats (0.10), and Maghsoudi et al (2009) for Iranian Cashmere goats (0.20).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar m 2 estimate to our current study was reported earlier by Maghsoudi et al (2009), Shaat andMaki-Tanila (2009) and Supakorn and Pralomkarn (2009). However, higher estimate was reported by Kantanamalakul et al (2008) for mixed goat population and Zhang et al (2008, Zhang et al 2009) for Boer goats. Column in italics represents estimates from best model as per LRT a s 2 a , s 2 m , s 2 c , s 2 e and s 2 p are additive direct, maternal direct genetic, maternal permanent environmental, residual variance and phenotypic variance, respectively; h 2 is heritability; m 2 is σ m 2 /s 2 p ; c 2 is s 2 c /s 2 p ; t m is maternal across year repeatability for ewe performance; h t 2 is total heritability and log L is log likelihood for the model obtained from DFREML (Meyer 2000) b Indicates that the approximation used to define standard errors of parameter estimates failed…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Three month weight had negative phenotypic correlation with 12MWT probably could be due to environmental and managemental variations. This is in agreement with the results of Miraei et al (2007) and Zhang et al (2009). Phenotypic correlations of 12MWT with other traits were positive except for 3MWT.…”
Section: Phenotypic Correlationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Genetic merit for growth of meat producing animals is generally assessed treating records taken at different ages, or ranges of ages, as different traits [5,6] . Zhang et al [7] reported that the mean values and standard errors of direct additive heritability estimates calculated with the optimum model were 0.17±0.07, 0.22±0.08, 0.07±0.07, 0.10±0.08, 0.30±0.12 and 0.08±0.10 for birth weight, body weight at 90 days, average daily gains from birth to 90 days, body weight at 300 days, average daily gains from birth to 300 days and average daily gains from 90 to 300 days, respectively for Boer goat. Janssens and Vandepitte [8] showed that heritability of body measurements were in the range of 0.26-0.57 and genetic correlations between these traits were high for Belgian Bleu du Maine, Suffolk and Texel sheep.…”
Section: Traditionally Traits That Are Measured In Time Arementioning
confidence: 99%