2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and non-genetic parameters related to embryo production in superovulated Large White (LW) gilts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with our previous studies [6] and indicate that the superovulation treatment did not interfere with the events that control oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development. It is generally assumed that superovulation treatments induce variability in the ovulatory response [20]. However, the ovulatory response variability found in the present study (CV<18%) and in our previous studies (CV = 21.4%) was much lower than previously reported values of approximately 40% in experiments with similar superovulation treatments (800 IU-1500 IU eCG) in cyclic gilts and sows [20][23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with our previous studies [6] and indicate that the superovulation treatment did not interfere with the events that control oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development. It is generally assumed that superovulation treatments induce variability in the ovulatory response [20]. However, the ovulatory response variability found in the present study (CV<18%) and in our previous studies (CV = 21.4%) was much lower than previously reported values of approximately 40% in experiments with similar superovulation treatments (800 IU-1500 IU eCG) in cyclic gilts and sows [20][23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…It is generally assumed that superovulation treatments induce variability in the ovulatory response [20]. However, the ovulatory response variability found in the present study (CV<18%) and in our previous studies (CV = 21.4%) was much lower than previously reported values of approximately 40% in experiments with similar superovulation treatments (800 IU-1500 IU eCG) in cyclic gilts and sows [20][23]. Although the reasons for these differences are unclear, these studies used different lines and breeds, which can exhibit widely variable superovulatory responses [7], possibly explaining such discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was not abnormal because such variability has been widely reported [39,40,41,42]. However, the variation observed in this study and our previous study [23] was low compared with those reported for cyclic gilts and sows, wherein the CVs were approximately 40% [39,40,41,42]. The different superovulation protocols and the different lines and breeds used among these studies, which can exhibit widely variable superovulatory responses [21], likely contributed to this discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…; Furstoss et al. ) have reported CV values close to 40%. However, in the present study, the variability in the ovulatory response (CV = 19.4%) was similar to that reported for non‐superovulated gilts and sows (Longenecker and Day ; Gama and Johnson ; Bracken et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One problem related to superovulation treatment is the variability in the ovulatory response (Furstoss et al. ). Several experiments using superovulation treatments of 800 IU to 1500 IU eCG in cyclic gilts and sows (Hazeleger et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%