2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001250051328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and immunological characteristics of Type I diabetes mellitus in an Indo-Aryan population

Abstract: Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes results from the progressive autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells [1]. The autoimmune aetiology is signified in Europid populations by a strong association with alleles of the HLA class II histocompatibility genes, particularly those carried on the DR3.DQ2 and DR4.DQ8 haplotypes [2], and the presence of circulating antibodies specific for islet antigens including glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), the intracellular fragment of protein tyrosine phosphatase-2 (IA-2i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(27 reference statements)
10
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While explanation for these apparent discrepancies remain speculative at this stage, it is likely due to sample size differences, selection of study subjects, and the failure to control for potential covariates by earlier studies (1,5). The identification of DRB1*030101-DQB1*0201 and DRB1* 040101-DQB1*0302 as T1D-susceptible haplotypes and of DRB1*070101-DQB1*0201 and DRB1*110101-DQB1*030101 as T1D-protective haplotypes was comparable to previous results with Caucasians (3,13,19,21). Of these haplotypes, regression analysis rejected DRB1*110101-DQB1*030101 as a T1D-protective haplotype, and its presence in a homozygous or heterozygous state did not impart any T1D protection aspect according to the model employed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While explanation for these apparent discrepancies remain speculative at this stage, it is likely due to sample size differences, selection of study subjects, and the failure to control for potential covariates by earlier studies (1,5). The identification of DRB1*030101-DQB1*0201 and DRB1* 040101-DQB1*0302 as T1D-susceptible haplotypes and of DRB1*070101-DQB1*0201 and DRB1*110101-DQB1*030101 as T1D-protective haplotypes was comparable to previous results with Caucasians (3,13,19,21). Of these haplotypes, regression analysis rejected DRB1*110101-DQB1*030101 as a T1D-protective haplotype, and its presence in a homozygous or heterozygous state did not impart any T1D protection aspect according to the model employed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, it appears that DQB1*0201 did not play a significant role in T1D pathogenesis and that the disease protection or susceptibility may be explained the presence of DQB1*0201 haplotypes with protective or susceptible DRB1 alleles, respectively, as was also suggested elsewhere (10). DRB1*030101-DQB1*0201 and DRB1*040101-DQB1*0302 were strongly associated with, while DRB1*070101-DQB1* 0201 was protective of T1D, further supporting the notion that DRB1*030101-DQB1*0201 on its own is a major T1D susceptibility haplotype among Caucasians (3,13,19). Our findings were reminiscent of earlier studies of Tunisians, which showed that DR3 and DR4 (1,5) and DRB1*03-DQB1*0201 and DRB1*04-DQB1*0302 haplotypes (1) were strongly associated with T1D.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected difference in LADA prevalence using only GADA or GADA along with other diabetes autoantibody would not be significant [15]. In the past, low frequency of IA-2 autoantibody has been reported among adults of North Indian origin and Indo-Aryan children with DM1 [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are no prevalence data available for adult-onset (> 30 years) DM-1A in North Indians but earlier studies have shown the prevalence of DM1-A to be lower among children and adolescents in North Indian populations than in Caucasians [34,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%