2004
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.05408-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus from intravenous drug user lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A high number of exotoxin genes was carried by each isolate, independently of whether they were recovered from blood (11-23 genes) or wounds (8-19 genes). Numerous virulence genes were also reported in S. aureus from other hospitals (Monk et al, 2004;Campbell et al, 2008;Holtfreter et al, 2007;Argudín et al, 2009;Varshney et al, 2009). In the present work, the detected genes appeared in many different combinations, with almost every isolate showing a distinct pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A high number of exotoxin genes was carried by each isolate, independently of whether they were recovered from blood (11-23 genes) or wounds (8-19 genes). Numerous virulence genes were also reported in S. aureus from other hospitals (Monk et al, 2004;Campbell et al, 2008;Holtfreter et al, 2007;Argudín et al, 2009;Varshney et al, 2009). In the present work, the detected genes appeared in many different combinations, with almost every isolate showing a distinct pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Previously reported ST123 strains are all United Kingdom isolates (http://www.mlst.net/), which suggests that the EEFIC may have originated in the United Kingdom. This ST has been described as a nasal carriage strain (8), although it also caused soft tissue infection in an intravenous drug user (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, and in contrast to the MLST tree, these data suggest that ST45 and ST30 share a common ancestor. Group 1b contains no major nosocomial lineages; although ST59 was found to be relatively common amongst intravenous drug users in Brighton, UK (Monk et al, 2004), and is an important community-acquired MRSA from the USA (Pan et al, 2005;Vandenesch et al, 2003). Group 2 contains the related CC8 clones (EMRSA-1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11 and 17), which includes the first MRSA lineage to be described (Crisostomo et al, 2001), ST5 (EMRSA-3; the New York/Japan clone) (Oliveira et al, 2002) and ST1, which is the genotype of sequenced strains MSSA476 (Holden et al, 2004) and MW2 (Kuroda et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%