2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of reproductive performance in Landrace sows and its correlation to piglet growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, both the heritability and the permanent environmental effect estimates were consistent with those of the Danish Large White pig population (Estany & Sorensen 1995; 0.11 and 0.086, respectively). In the present study, the heritability of AWW (0.08) was less than that of mean piglet weight in the litter at 3 weeks of age for the first and second parities in the Landrace pig population reported by Lundgren et al . (2010; 0.21), suggesting differences in parity number and management factors such as feeding strategies and weaning age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Additionally, both the heritability and the permanent environmental effect estimates were consistent with those of the Danish Large White pig population (Estany & Sorensen 1995; 0.11 and 0.086, respectively). In the present study, the heritability of AWW (0.08) was less than that of mean piglet weight in the litter at 3 weeks of age for the first and second parities in the Landrace pig population reported by Lundgren et al . (2010; 0.21), suggesting differences in parity number and management factors such as feeding strategies and weaning age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Despite the transformation, the distribution of WSI50 was still skewed (Figure 1). The estimated heritabilities in this study for WSI7 (h 2 = 0.12, PSD = 0.05) and WSI50 (h 2 = 0.14, PSD = 0.05) were slightly higher than earlier reported estimates (0.03 to 0.08) from the same population (Holm et al, 2004;Lundgren et al, 2010). Adamec and Johnson (1997) reported a heritability of 0.14 for weaning-to-service interval analysed with no upper limit of days.…”
Section: Heritabilitiescontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In their study, heritability for body condition during lactation was estimated at 0.13 and after weaning the lambs at 0.15. The heritability estimate for mean piglet weight in this study (0.23) was comparable with previously published reports (Hö gberg and Rydhmer, 2000) and previous estimates from the Norwegian Landrace population Lundgren et al, 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%