1985
DOI: 10.1128/jb.162.3.1173-1179.1985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of mutations that compensate for loss of Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I

Abstract: A transposon TnWO insertion in topA, the structural gene of Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I, behaves as an excluded marker in genetic crosses with many strains of E. coli. However, derivative strains that accept this mutant topA allele are readily selected. We show that many of these topA mutant strains contain additional mutations that compensate for the loss of DNA topoisomerase I. Genetic methods for mapping and manipulating such compensatory mutations are described. These methods include a plate-matin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplification mcdel also explains several unusual properties cf toe mutations, (i) The high frequency at which toe mutations arise (10"^) is typical of duplications and rather higher than that for point mutations (Anderson and Roth, 1981). (ii) The variable linkage between totC and metC in different toe strains (Raji et at., 1985; this paper) can be explained if variable amounts of DNA are amplified or if the copy number of the amplification varies, (iii) toe mutations arise at very reduced frequencies, if at all, in a recA strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The amplification mcdel also explains several unusual properties cf toe mutations, (i) The high frequency at which toe mutations arise (10"^) is typical of duplications and rather higher than that for point mutations (Anderson and Roth, 1981). (ii) The variable linkage between totC and metC in different toe strains (Raji et at., 1985; this paper) can be explained if variable amounts of DNA are amplified or if the copy number of the amplification varies, (iii) toe mutations arise at very reduced frequencies, if at all, in a recA strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, osmolarity had a profound effect on the survival of topA strains; this is considered more fully below. Raji et al (1985) have previously shown that toe mutants remain sensitive to C0IEI. As, by definition, tolC mutants are C0IEI -resistant, the two classes of mutations appear phenotypically distinct.…”
Section: Genetie Evidenee That Toe Mutations Involve a Dna Amplifieationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacterial strains and growth conditions The E. coli strain HB101 (supE44 hsdS20(r B ¹ m B ¹ ) recA13 ara-14 proA2 lacY1 galK2 rpsL20 xyl-5 mtl-1) (Bolivar et al, 1977) and the topA mutant RED31 (Hfr thi-1 rel-1 lac-42 acrA topA20 ::Tn10 toc-1) (Raji et al, 1985) were used in this study. As E. coli cells lacking a functional TopA are not viable without a compensatory mutation (DiNardo et al, 1982;Pruss et al, 1982), the topA strain RED31 also contains a compensatory mutation, toc-1 (topoisomerase one compensatory) which involves an amplification of the parC and parE genes that encode DNA topoisomerase IV (Dorman et al, 1989;Kato et al, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because DNA gyrase and Topo I have opposing effects on DNA superhelicity, changes in the expression or activity of either Topo I or DNA gyrase are offset by corresponding changes in the other topoisomerase if the cell is to maintain a level of negative supercoiling that is optimal for growth. Thus, partial or complete loss of Topo I activity by mutations in the topA gene leads to reduced DNA gyrase activity, either by downregulation of the supercoiling-sensitive promoters of gyrA and gyrB (Menzel and Gellert, 1983;Miller and Simons, 1993) or through compensatory mutations in the GyrA and GyrB subunits (DiNardo et al ., 1982;Raji et al ., 1985) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%