1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of inbreeding depression in plus tree 850.55 of Pinus radiata D. Don. I. Genetic map with distorted markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the same species have detected up to 34 % of segregation distortion (Kuang et al 1999), however the smaller number of offspring compared to earlier studies (Wilcox et al 2001, Devey et al 2004 could be responsible for the low representativeness of the expected allelic proportions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the same species have detected up to 34 % of segregation distortion (Kuang et al 1999), however the smaller number of offspring compared to earlier studies (Wilcox et al 2001, Devey et al 2004 could be responsible for the low representativeness of the expected allelic proportions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Polymorphic information, mode of inheritance, genomic size and complexity are factors that influence the development of a particular technique and the selection of informative molecular markers (Plomion et al 2007). Among the molecular techniques implemented for P. radiata are restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP; Devey et al 2004), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Kuang et al 1999, Wilcox et al 2001, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP; Wilcox et al 2001), simple sequence repeat (SSR; Fisher et al 1998, Devey et al 2002, Chagné et al 2004) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; Dillon et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more species chromosomal information is need for understand of species relationships in respect to chromosomes in a large genus Pinus. On the other hand the genome studies are progressing in several pine species of P. radiate (Kuang et al 1999), P. thumbergii (Kondo et al 2000), P. contorta (Li and Yeh 2001), P. elliottii (Brown et al 2001), P. pinaster (Chagné et al 2003), P. sylvestris (Hurne et al 2000;Komulainen et al 2003), P. densiflora (Kim et al 2005), P. taeda (Echt et al 2011;Martínez-García et al 2013), P. lambertiana (Jermstad et al 2011) and P. balfouriana (Friedline et al 2015) and their genome maps are constructed by various molecular markers such as AFLPs, RFLPs, RAPDs, ESTPs, cDNA and SSRs and compared among species in respect to synteny (see Jermstad et al 2011). In pine genome study correspondence between individual chromosomes and linkage groups of genetic map is not established in Pinus.…”
Section: Abstract: Chromosome Diploxylon Pine Fluorescent Band Karmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, 32% of the loci presented segregation distortion. Polymorphisms that showed significant departures from Mendelian expectations have been reported for all types of markers (RFLP, RAPD, SCAR, AFLP, microsatellite, isoenzyme) used in crops and forest trees (Aravanopoulos et al, 1993;Kuang et al, 1999), but the causes of this phenomenon are not well understood. The percentage of loci showing segregation distortion is highly variable in forest trees: 69% in Cryptomeria japonica (Nikaido et al, 1999), 20% in Quercus robur (Barreneche et al, 1998), 18% in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Krutovskii et al, 1998), 14% in Populus (Bradshaw et al, 1994), and 15% in Salix exigua (Aravanopoulos et al, 1993).…”
Section: Marker Polymorphism and Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any distorted markers were eliminated from the dataset. Kuang et al (1999) showed that recombination frequency is not affected by the segregation distortion caused by a viability gene or sampling error. Nevertheless, distorted markers were eliminated based on low marker coverage of the genome and low number of progeny.…”
Section: Linkage Analysis and Map Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%