2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-017-1861-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis and gain from selection of thrips resistance in cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying such resistance in A. hypogaea provides tetraploid sources for introgressing smut resistance into new, elite peanut cultivars or breeding populations, without requiring pre-breeding of resistant diploid germplasm. Additionally, using A. hypogaea sources of resistance can help reduce potential linkage drag of undesirable alleles from resistant wild Arachis species, as evidenced in other crops (Wann et al, 2017). However, depending on the source, using a tetraploid source of resistance may make it more complicated to pyramid resistance from both Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying such resistance in A. hypogaea provides tetraploid sources for introgressing smut resistance into new, elite peanut cultivars or breeding populations, without requiring pre-breeding of resistant diploid germplasm. Additionally, using A. hypogaea sources of resistance can help reduce potential linkage drag of undesirable alleles from resistant wild Arachis species, as evidenced in other crops (Wann et al, 2017). However, depending on the source, using a tetraploid source of resistance may make it more complicated to pyramid resistance from both Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual thrips injury ratings were also conducted on the aforementioned evaluations at the fifth‐true‐leaf stage, using the 1‐to‐9 rating scale reported by Wann et al (2017), where 1 = no observable damage and 9 = complete plant necrosis. The evaluations were conducted under natural thrips infestations at the field level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important component of resistance in G. barbadense is a thicker outer epidermal layer on the underside of the cotton leaf (Arif et al, 2004; Bowman and McCarty, 1997; Gawaad and Soliman, 2009). Introgressing this resistance into G. hirsutum germplasm, however, could prove difficult across species boundaries and given the photoperiodic nature of some of the most thrips‐resistant G. barbadense accessions (Arnold et al, 2010; Wann et al, 2017; Zhang et al, 2013). Therefore, selecting within G. hirsutum , directly or indirectly, for similar morphological characteristics may aid in developing breeding populations with elevated tolerance to thrips feeding, without the confounding aspects and background variation characteristic of many interspecific breeding populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Wann et al, 2017); and disease severity in wheat (Iqbal et al, 2016;Saintenac et al, 2018), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.; Kakueinezhad et al, 2018;Vogel et al, 2018), common bean (Amaro et al, 2007), and coffee (Coffea arabica L.; Botelho et al, 2017). ; Wann et al, 2017); and disease severity in wheat (Iqbal et al, 2016;Saintenac et al, 2018), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.; Kakueinezhad et al, 2018;Vogel et al, 2018), common bean (Amaro et al, 2007), and coffee (Coffea arabica L.; Botelho et al, 2017).…”
Section: New Proposals To Estimate Unbiased Selection Gain and Coeffimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. ; Wann et al, 2017); and disease severity in wheat (Iqbal et al, 2016;Saintenac et al, 2018), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.; Kakueinezhad et al, 2018;Vogel et al, 2018), common bean (Amaro et al, 2007), and coffee (Coffea arabica L.; Botelho et al, 2017). Usually, these score scales are treated as interval scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%