1995
DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(95)00059-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm for assembly line balancing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple assembly line balancing problem, the most employed form of line balancing problems, assumes the single-model production, and was considered by a vast number of publications such as Baybars (1986), Saltzman andBaybars (1987), Hoffmann (1992), Rubinovitz and Levitin (1995), Klein and Scholl (1996), Sprecher (1999), Peeters and Degraeve (2006), Gokcen et al (2005), Zhang et al (2007, Liu et al (2008), Nourmohammadi andZandieh (2011).…”
Section: International Journal Of Production Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple assembly line balancing problem, the most employed form of line balancing problems, assumes the single-model production, and was considered by a vast number of publications such as Baybars (1986), Saltzman andBaybars (1987), Hoffmann (1992), Rubinovitz and Levitin (1995), Klein and Scholl (1996), Sprecher (1999), Peeters and Degraeve (2006), Gokcen et al (2005), Zhang et al (2007, Liu et al (2008), Nourmohammadi andZandieh (2011).…”
Section: International Journal Of Production Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can calculate R e (k,n,t) in the transformed scale by (25), (26) or (27), and the system failure rate α i can be obtained by (18), (19) and (21) with h 0 (t′)=1. Therefore, unless otherwise specified, only the TFR models with an exponential failure time baseline distribution are discussed in this paper.…”
Section: R K N T T T Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…components and the exponential failure time distributions can be easily derived as follows. (27) For the TFR models with an arbitrary baseline failure distribution F(t), we can perform the time transformation suggested by Amari et al [3]:…”
Section: Tfr Model For An Exactly K-out-n: F Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution flexibility can be determined from precedence matrix by measuring − (flexibility ratio). Higher − indicates less precedence constraints and greater flexibility in generating multiple feasible solutions (Rubinovitz et al, 1995).…”
Section: First Stage Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%