2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(03)00057-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm based feature selection for target detection in SAR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature contrast brightness of blob (9) is the best one with recognition rate 0.98. To show the efficacy of CGP in synthesizing effective composite features, we consider three cases: only the worst two primitive features (blob inertia (6) and mean values of pixels within blob (8)) are used by CGP; five bad primitive features (blob inertia (6), mean values of pixels within blob Table 2 shows the maximum and minimum recognition rates in these experiments, where tr and te mean training and testing and max and min stand for the maximum and minimum recognition rates. , it is obvious that composite feature vectors synthesized by CGP are very effective in distinguishing object from clutter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feature contrast brightness of blob (9) is the best one with recognition rate 0.98. To show the efficacy of CGP in synthesizing effective composite features, we consider three cases: only the worst two primitive features (blob inertia (6) and mean values of pixels within blob (8)) are used by CGP; five bad primitive features (blob inertia (6), mean values of pixels within blob Table 2 shows the maximum and minimum recognition rates in these experiments, where tr and te mean training and testing and max and min stand for the maximum and minimum recognition rates. , it is obvious that composite feature vectors synthesized by CGP are very effective in distinguishing object from clutter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Set of Terminals: The set of terminals used in this paper are 20 primitive features used in [6]. The first 10 of them are designed by MIT Lincoln lab to capture the particular characteristics of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery and are found useful for object detection.…”
Section: Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of wrapper-based methods have been used including forward selection [9]; backward elimination [10]; hill-climbing [11]; branch and bound algorithms [12]; simulated annealing and genetic algorithms (GAs) [13,14,15,16]. Kudo and Sklansky [17] made a comparison among many of the feature selection algorithms and explicitly recommended that GAs should be used for large-scale problems with more than 50 candidate variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO is similar to the genetic algorithms (GAs) in the sense that these two heuristics are population-based search techniques, namely, PSO and GA operate on a population (swarm) and transform it to another set of population in a single iteration with likely improvement using a combination or deterministic and probabilistic rules. PSO is quite often compared with GA [13][14][15][16][17]. Interestingly, most of the literature is concerned with simple comparative scenarios involving experiments exploiting numeric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, most of the literature is concerned with simple comparative scenarios involving experiments exploiting numeric data. An interesting comparison of PSO and GA with a focus on dimensionality aspects of the problems has been offered in [13] and [15], respectively. Statistical comparison using t-test is presented in [16] for several benchmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%