2021
DOI: 10.1364/prj.416294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic-algorithm-based deep neural networks for highly efficient photonic device design

Abstract: While deep learning has demonstrated tremendous potential for photonic device design, it often demands a large amount of labeled data to train these deep neural network models. Preparing these data requires high-resolution numerical simulations or experimental measurements and cost significant, if not prohibitive, time and resources. In this work, we present a highly efficient inverse design method that combines deep neural networks with a genetic algorithm to optimize the geometry of photonic devices in the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the nanophotonics polarization beam splitter was demonstrated with a footprint of only 2.4 × 2.4 μm 2 , [35] and synchronously a compact on-chip wavelength demultiplexer was reported with a footprint of only 2.8 × 2.8 μm 2 . [36] Thereafter, various ultracompact photonic devices were demonstrated, such as polarization rotator, [37] polarization splitterrotator, [38] wavelength demultiplexer, [39,40] power splitter, [41][42][43][44][45] waveguide crossing, [46,47] mode (de)multiplexer, [48,49] bending, [50] nonlinear nanophotonic device, [51] twisted light emitter, [52] and even the equation solver. [53][54][55] The inverse-designed method was also applied for densely integrated waveguides and modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the nanophotonics polarization beam splitter was demonstrated with a footprint of only 2.4 × 2.4 μm 2 , [35] and synchronously a compact on-chip wavelength demultiplexer was reported with a footprint of only 2.8 × 2.8 μm 2 . [36] Thereafter, various ultracompact photonic devices were demonstrated, such as polarization rotator, [37] polarization splitterrotator, [38] wavelength demultiplexer, [39,40] power splitter, [41][42][43][44][45] waveguide crossing, [46,47] mode (de)multiplexer, [48,49] bending, [50] nonlinear nanophotonic device, [51] twisted light emitter, [52] and even the equation solver. [53][54][55] The inverse-designed method was also applied for densely integrated waveguides and modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…network can process data effectively and learn rich representations by its strong capacity in dealing with high-dimensional massive data, Impressed by the application prospects of DL, some works have tried Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [9][10][11][12][13]18] to design and optimize optoelectronic devices such as nanoscale lasers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 Optimization algorithms have been proven to be useful tools in tasks such as detection of qudit states 51 and quantum state engineering. 52,53 Machine learning and genetic algorithms have also found many uses in photonics, 54,55 including the use of generative models, 56 quantum state reconstruction, 57,58 automated design of experimental platforms, [59][60][61] quantum state and gate engineering, 52,53,[62][63][64][65] and the study of Bell nonlocality. [66][67][68] Moreover, genetic algorithms have been employed to design adaptive spatial mode sorters using random scattering processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%