2012
DOI: 10.1002/acs.2320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm for speed error reduction in railway signaling systems

Abstract: The paper deals with common concepts of modern methods of train speed determination with minimal errors. Balise locations depend on a variety of parameters. With genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization, as two new intelligent algorithms, and Kalman filtering concept used, the best locations are determined to reduce tachometer errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…defect prediction [80] failure prediction [81] defect detection [82] Y: defect prediction [83] defect detection [84], [85] Safety and security Y: train protection [86], speed error reduction [87] Y: accidents [53] disruptions [88] Autonomous driving and control Y: energy optimization [89] intelligent train control [90] Y: intelligent train control [55] Traffic planning and management Y: train timetabling [91], [92] Y: delay analysis [40], train rescheduling [93] train timetabling [63], [94], train shunting [95] Revenue management P: revenue simulation [96] P: overall revenue management [97] inventory control and prediction [98] Transport policy P: energy network policy making [99] U Passenger mobility P: demand forecasting [100] Y: flow prediction [101], [102] and reinforcement learning for optimal train control. Reference [89] proposed a method for energy optimisation of the train movement applying control based on genetic algorithms.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…defect prediction [80] failure prediction [81] defect detection [82] Y: defect prediction [83] defect detection [84], [85] Safety and security Y: train protection [86], speed error reduction [87] Y: accidents [53] disruptions [88] Autonomous driving and control Y: energy optimization [89] intelligent train control [90] Y: intelligent train control [55] Traffic planning and management Y: train timetabling [91], [92] Y: delay analysis [40], train rescheduling [93] train timetabling [63], [94], train shunting [95] Revenue management P: revenue simulation [96] P: overall revenue management [97] inventory control and prediction [98] Transport policy P: energy network policy making [99] U Passenger mobility P: demand forecasting [100] Y: flow prediction [101], [102] and reinforcement learning for optimal train control. Reference [89] proposed a method for energy optimisation of the train movement applying control based on genetic algorithms.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper also shows that rail traffic can be improved regarding the increase of timetable stability and maximizing capacity subject to safety constraints. More strategically, [87] combined a genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimisation algorithm, and Kalman filtering for determining the best locations of balises in order to minimise speed error of railway vehicles. Passenger mobility.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balises provide information to a train to check the actual train location and to calibrate its odometer. It is mentioned in [9] that proper balise positioning also reduces train headways and corrects speed errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 These algorithms have been investigated in many articles, and their performances were compared in terms of processing time, convergence speed and quality of results. [15][16][17] These recent items may be considered as a benchmark to compare different EAs for different applications. Although all EAs attempt to achieve the global optimum of a problem, the convergence speed and the quality of results may be different depending on their type, parameters and applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%