Genesis of phenotypic and genotypic diversity in land plants: The present as the key to the past

Abstract

The evolutionary history of vascular plants is reviewed by extrapolation back through time from a wide range of data recently derived from the present flora, using as the central theme evolutionary inferences gained from phylogenies reconstructed as cladograms. Any region of the genome can be used to infer relationships, but only a combination of knowledge of morphology and the developmental genes that underpin morphology can allow evolutionary interpretation of macroevolutionary transitions; this in turn is necessary to identify bona fide evolutionary radiations and any putative causal key innovations. Such studies require clades to be delimited not by the inclusion of particular extant 'crown' species but rather by specific apomorphies, thereby giving important phylogenetic roles to extinct as well as extant species. Dating phylogenetic divergences via molecular clocks remains seriously inaccurate, and ultimately relies primarily on fossil benchmarks. First principles suggest that evolution of most regions of the genome is fundamentally gradual, whereas evolution of regions especially prone to strong selection pressure, and of the many facets of the phenotype, is punctuational, being characterized through time dominantly by stasis. Sequence data have proved valuable for inferring monophyletic groups, but within the now widely accepted context of monophyly the taxonomic hierarchy should primarily reflect degrees of morphological rather than molecular divergence. Incongruence among contrasting data sets is best explained by understanding the biological constraints operating on each type of phylogenetic information. The conventional 'uniformitarian' view of evolution has only limited applicability as one traces the history of land plants through time. Diversity increased in stepwise fashion, reflecting either attainments of complexity and/or fitness thresholds by the lineage (intrinsic) or the availability of unusually permissive environments, often following major perturbations (extrinsic). The Quaternary period demonstrates especially well the resilience, and ease of migration, of the Earth's vegetation. A higher frequency of generation of novel phenotypes in the deep past is possible, but a far higher frequency of their establishment is certain; together, these factors generate an evolutionary pattern of nested radiations that is fractal, as saturation of the resource space rendered the environment decreasingly permissive through time.In the immediate future, evolutionary-developmental genetics will have increasing value for testing homology, interpreting homoplasy and elucidating evolutionary constraints, and will become easierto pursue as whole-genome sequences of additional 'model' species further invigorate comparative genomics. Complexity of gene regulation, both by other genes and by the cellular and extra-cellular environment, appears a particularly fruitful area for further research. Nonetheless, environmental filtering of evolutionary novelties (whether instantaneously isolated mutant 'prospec...

Impact of an icehouse climate interval on tropical vegetation and plant evolution

“…However, these changes do not involve major body-plan evolutionary innovations. Evolutionary innovation that results in major new body plans appears to be confined to those times and places where extrinsic drivers either create new habitats or cause extinctions, thus opening major resource spaces to colonization (Valentine 1980;Bateman and DiMichele 2003) and enhancing the likelihood of pulses of niche construction (Erwin 2008). These events are generally rare, and conform to periods of 'escalation' (Vermeij 1987).…”

Perspectiva paleobotánica y geológica de la biodiversidad en México

“…Los cambios biológicos que se han dado a través del tiempo, se pueden comprobar de manera diversa; por ejemplo por medio de los múltiples estudios numéricos que hoy son ampliamente utilizados y que han incentivado el entendimiento de muchos aspectos de la vida y sus procesos. Sin embargo, entre las observaciones históricas siguen siendo aquellas de las Ciencias de la Tierra, incluyendo a la paleontología y paleobiología, las únicas fuentes directas a través de la cual se pueden comprobar las hipótesis que se generan a través de estas investigaciones (e.g., Nixon, 1996;Bateman y DiMichele, 2003;Bradley et al, 2003, Crane et al, 2004Lewis, 2006;Hilton y Bateman, 2006 ). Lo anterior lo podemos ejemplificar con datos que requirieron de muchos años de observación y experimentación.…”