2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-016-0572-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genes, social transmission, but not maternal effects influence responses of wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) to novel-object and novel-food tests

Abstract: Using long-term maternal pedigree data, microsatellite analysis, and behavioral tests, we examined whether personality differences in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) are associated with additive genetic effects, maternal influences, or belonging to a particular social group. Behaviors elicited by novel-object tests were defined by a component related to caution around novel-objects (Ob-PC1) and behaviors elicited by novel food-tests were defined by correlated components related to consummatory response… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following these results, behavioral reaction norms of neophobia or exploration tendency with varying social contexts could be further tested in a longitudinal setting to assess the degree to which individual differences in reaction norms are stable throughout development, i.e., their rank-order stability. There are also examples of behavioral tests conducted with NHPs in the wild (e.g., playback experiments in Neumann et al 2013; novel-object and novel-food tests in Arnaud et al 2017). These could be paired with environmental information (e.g., current group composition, time elapsed since among-group conflict, etc.)…”
Section: What Do Our Measurements Tell Us About Stability? and What Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these results, behavioral reaction norms of neophobia or exploration tendency with varying social contexts could be further tested in a longitudinal setting to assess the degree to which individual differences in reaction norms are stable throughout development, i.e., their rank-order stability. There are also examples of behavioral tests conducted with NHPs in the wild (e.g., playback experiments in Neumann et al 2013; novel-object and novel-food tests in Arnaud et al 2017). These could be paired with environmental information (e.g., current group composition, time elapsed since among-group conflict, etc.)…”
Section: What Do Our Measurements Tell Us About Stability? and What Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of tool-use behavior and diet in the wild (i.e., non-provisioned foods) was compiled from the literature. The Koshima Island macaques split into two groups in the 1970s, with the main group continuing to be provisioned on the sand, but the smaller 'Maki group' remaining restricted to the North end of the Island, although this group as well as solitary males would on occasion join the regular provisioning of the main group on the sand substrate (Arnaud et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, group composition (Oostindjer et al, 2011) and an individual's own position in a group (Amici et al, 2020) can affect food neophobic responses. Finally, juveniles have been found less food neophobic than adults in some primates (Visalberghi et al, 2003;Ueno and Matsuzawa, 2005;Addessi and Visalberghi, 2006; but see Gustafsson et al, 2014;Arnaud et al, 2017). While studies generally find considerable differences in food neophobia between individuals (e.g., Marples et al, 1998;Exnerova et al, 2010;Liebl and Martin, 2014), few studies have investigated whether or not individuals are consistent in these differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%