2010
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genes, mutations, and human inherited disease at the dawn of the age of personalized genomics

Abstract: The number of reported germline mutations in human nuclear genes, either underlying or associated with inherited disease, has now exceeded 100,000 in more than 3,700 different genes. The availability of these data has both revolutionized the study of the morbid anatomy of the human genome and facilitated “personalized genomics.” With ∼300 new “inherited disease genes” (and ∼10,000 new mutations) being identified annually, it is pertinent to ask how many “inherited disease genes” there are in the human genome, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 360 publications
2
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterozygous MUTYH mutations were not identified in the remaining 84 index patients, for which somatic mutations or further germline pathomechanisms, for example, large genomic rearrangements such as inversions in the MMR genes have to be considered. 3,[26][27][28] In the control cohort the MUTYH mutation frequency of 1.24% was comparable to the frequencies of 0%-4.8% reported in the general population. 12,22,29 As MAP can manifest in an extremely variable phenotype, MUTYH mutation analysis should also be considered in patients with a low number of adenomas, early-onset or synchronous or metachronous CRC and in patients with MSS tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Heterozygous MUTYH mutations were not identified in the remaining 84 index patients, for which somatic mutations or further germline pathomechanisms, for example, large genomic rearrangements such as inversions in the MMR genes have to be considered. 3,[26][27][28] In the control cohort the MUTYH mutation frequency of 1.24% was comparable to the frequencies of 0%-4.8% reported in the general population. 12,22,29 As MAP can manifest in an extremely variable phenotype, MUTYH mutation analysis should also be considered in patients with a low number of adenomas, early-onset or synchronous or metachronous CRC and in patients with MSS tumours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, another mutation in the OPLAH gene is improbable except located in a deep intronic region. Splicing mutations account for around 10 % of all reported mutations and deep intronic mutations represent less than 1 % of known splicing mutations (Cooper et al 2010). All these data together suggest that these two probands seem to be carriers of only one defect in the OPLAH gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This difficulty is most clearly reflected in the distribution of mutations listed in databases of Mendelian disorders, such as the Human Gene Mutation Database, where most mutations are found within coding regions (86%) or at intronic splice sites (11%), with only a small fraction (3%) identified in regulatory regions (14). Newer methods for annotating and predicting the impact of noncoding (NC) variants have provided substantial improvements (15,16), but experimental validation of the presumed effects remains critical for the determination of pathogenicity and elucidation of the mechanism of action (13,17).…”
Section: Mendelian Erythroid Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%