1989
DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genes encoding the major surface glycoprotein in Leishmania are tandemly linked at a single chromosomal locus and are constitutively transcribed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
39
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of intergenic regions in Leishmania whose poly(A) and splice sites have been mapped reveals spacings from 85 to 660 nucleotides, with an average of 383 and a median of 390 (nine loci; Landfear et al 1986;Lee et al 1988;Kapler et al 1990a;Genske et al 1991;Flinn and Smith 1992). These values are consistent with the spacing inferred from Northern and Southern blot analyses of the HSP83, gp63, and A/D1/D2/B/C loci (Button et al 1989;Shapira and Pinelli 1989;Flinn and Smith 1992;Ramamoorthy et al 1992). Thus, poly(A) sites are always positioned close to downstream splice acceptor sites in Leishmania.…”
Section: Determinants Of Poly(a) Site Selection In Leishmaniasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A survey of intergenic regions in Leishmania whose poly(A) and splice sites have been mapped reveals spacings from 85 to 660 nucleotides, with an average of 383 and a median of 390 (nine loci; Landfear et al 1986;Lee et al 1988;Kapler et al 1990a;Genske et al 1991;Flinn and Smith 1992). These values are consistent with the spacing inferred from Northern and Southern blot analyses of the HSP83, gp63, and A/D1/D2/B/C loci (Button et al 1989;Shapira and Pinelli 1989;Flinn and Smith 1992;Ramamoorthy et al 1992). Thus, poly(A) sites are always positioned close to downstream splice acceptor sites in Leishmania.…”
Section: Determinants Of Poly(a) Site Selection In Leishmaniasupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Gp63 has been shown to be proteolytically active against a wide variety of different peptide substrates and has been reported to act as a ligand for macrophage receptors, either directly or after opsonization with complement, to protect the parasites from complementmediated lysis and also to contribute to the pathology of lesion development (see Alexander and Russell, 1992;Joshi et al, 1998). However, the fact that these proteins are encoded by multicopy polymorphic genes (Button et al, 1989;Lohman et al, 1990;Symons et al, 1994) has hindered elucidation of their function by genetic analysis (Joshi et al, 1998). Moreover, surface expression of gp63 and PSA2 is dramatically down-regulated in the amastigote stage of some Leishmania species and variable within particular parasite populations of others (Bahr et al, 1993;Handman et al, 1995) such that the precise function of these parasite proteins in the mammalian host remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All gp63 studied to date in the different Leishmania species share high nucleotide sequence identity and the enzyme has been shown to be encoded by a family of tandemly linked genes, all of which map to a single chromosome [162,163]. Additionally, the crystal structure of gp63 purified from L. major promastigotes reveals that this peptidase is a member of the metzincin family of zinc metallopeptidases, with an active site sequence motif of HEXXHXXGXH [164].…”
Section: Metallopeptidasesmentioning
confidence: 99%