2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222313037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genes and Pathways Associated with Skeletal Sagittal Malocclusions: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Skeletal class II and III malocclusions are craniofacial disorders that negatively impact people’s quality of life worldwide. Unfortunately, the growth patterns of skeletal malocclusions and their clinical correction prognoses are difficult to predict largely due to lack of knowledge of their precise etiology. Inspired by the strong inheritance pattern of a specific type of skeletal malocclusion, previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were reanalyzed, resulting in the identification of 19 skeletal cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature describes different patterns of skeletal classes’ distribution according to ethnicities: African and Caucasian populations show the highest prevalence of skeletal classes I and II, respectively, whereas Asians show the highest prevalence of class III, suggesting a genetic contribution to the malocclusions’ etiology [ 1 ]. To date, several genes (e.g., COL1A1 , FGFR2 , MATN1, and MYO1H ) and pathways (e.g., insulin receptor and FGFR2 signaling cascades) that are involved in craniofacial development have been identified [ 31 ]. However, due to the multifactorial etiology of malocclusions, more studies aimed at deepening the knowledge of the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying their etiology are needed, with the final aim of better understanding these traits and developing personalized treatment strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature describes different patterns of skeletal classes’ distribution according to ethnicities: African and Caucasian populations show the highest prevalence of skeletal classes I and II, respectively, whereas Asians show the highest prevalence of class III, suggesting a genetic contribution to the malocclusions’ etiology [ 1 ]. To date, several genes (e.g., COL1A1 , FGFR2 , MATN1, and MYO1H ) and pathways (e.g., insulin receptor and FGFR2 signaling cascades) that are involved in craniofacial development have been identified [ 31 ]. However, due to the multifactorial etiology of malocclusions, more studies aimed at deepening the knowledge of the molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying their etiology are needed, with the final aim of better understanding these traits and developing personalized treatment strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors intentionally did not include patients with skeletal class II in the study. It has been shown in the literature that there is a greater number of genetic factors influencing the development of skeletal class III than skeletal class II [25]. Moreover, there is ample evidence that genetic factors influence the length and anatomy of tooth roots [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to the best of our knowledge this is the first genetic study that mainly involved subjects who presented with skeletal class II division 1 due to mandibular deficiency. We decided to evaluate SNPs in these specific genes because of their role in bone and cartilage growth and development and skeletal muscle maturation and construction ( Gershater et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%