2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0129167x17500835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic sections of essentially isolated determinantal singularities

Abstract: Abstract. We study the essentially isolated determinantal singularities (EIDS), defined by W. Ebeling and S. , as a generalization of isolated singularity. We prove in dimension 3 a minimality theorem for the Milnor number of a generic hyperplane section of an EIDS, generalizing previous results by J. Snoussi in dimension 2. We define strongly generic hyperplane sections of an EIDS and show that they are still EIDS. Using strongly general hyperplanes, we extend a result of Lê D. T. concerning constancy of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We start with the natural notion of equivalence of map germs in this context. 9 cf. [20, Section 7.1.5] Definition 2.1.…”
Section: Unfoldings and Equivalence Of Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We start with the natural notion of equivalence of map germs in this context. 9 cf. [20, Section 7.1.5] Definition 2.1.…”
Section: Unfoldings and Equivalence Of Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d(r) = dim(X r+1 A , 0) = p − (m − r)(n − r). This theorem and its variants have appeared in several places such as [34], [9], [21], [82], [41], and [109].…”
Section: Construction Of Essential Smoothingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13], [14] and [5]), simultaneous studies of certain properties of EIDS of all matrix sizes and types only appear recently e.g. in [2] and [24]. In this section, we cover well-known facts about EIDS to give the reader the background knowledge for the subsequent considerations on the discriminant and the Tjurina transoform.…”
Section: Basic Facts On Eidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be no element of G leading from one representation of Pinkham's famous example [27] to the other, i.e. leading from a determinantal singularity of type (2,4,2) to one of type (3, 3, 2) (with the additional constraint of the matrix to be symmetric) or vice versa. It is important to observe that a restriction to G-equivalence does not fix the minimal size of the matrix, it only fixes some size, as any determinantal singularity of type (m, n, t) can easily be considered as one of type (m + 1, n + 1, t + 1) by simply adding an extra line and an extra column of which all entries are zero except the one where the row and column meet, which should then be chosen to be 1.…”
Section: Remark 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation