2019 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2019.8781346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic Model of PEM Fuel Cells and Performance Analysis in Frequency Containment Period in Systems with Decreased Inertia

Abstract: The increase in renewable energy sources in addition to the decrease in conventional synchronous generators is leading to significant challenges for the power system operators to maintain generation load balance and to manage the system's decreasing inertia. Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells are characterised by high current density and fast power injection, which makes them ideal for frequency containment. This paper presents a generic model for PEM fuel cells developed in PowerFactory for frequency s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the role this technology can play in frequency containment, F.A. Alshehri et al [52] developed a dynamic model to simulate PEMFC, validated that the model's response resembled the response shown in the existing literature, and compared the Frequency Containment Reserve (FCR) of PEMFC and synchronous generators. The scenarios consisted of a 50 MW disturbance for different system inertia with values 100%, 50%, and 25%, for both synchronous generators and PEMFC as FCR.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the role this technology can play in frequency containment, F.A. Alshehri et al [52] developed a dynamic model to simulate PEMFC, validated that the model's response resembled the response shown in the existing literature, and compared the Frequency Containment Reserve (FCR) of PEMFC and synchronous generators. The scenarios consisted of a 50 MW disturbance for different system inertia with values 100%, 50%, and 25%, for both synchronous generators and PEMFC as FCR.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the frequency response will be analysed in its more pure and classical primary response [5], and its indicators will be used to assess the existing UFLS scheme. The principal frequency response indicators are [6], [7]: (i) minimum frequency (fmin) refers to the minimum value of the frequency during the transient [8], (ii) minimum time (tmin) is the time required to reach fmin from the moment where the disturbance is inserted in the power system (t =0) [9], (iii) the Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF) is calculated as the rate of change of the frequency measured by the frequency relays and the unit used is Hz/sec [10]. Finally, (iv) Steady-state frequency (fss) is the capacity of the power system of recovering from the event is measured by the steady-state frequency; it represents the final value of the frequency when RoCoF is zero [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern power systems are evolving quite fast, and the new technologies for power generation and energy storage are helping to cope with the environmental need to reduce CO2 emission and stabilising a low carbon society [1]. On the other side of the power system, demand side, technical development, especially those related to the use of ICT, are making the demand more controllable, flexible and price sensible [2], [3]. Independently of the side (generation or demand), one key element in the modern power system evolution is the massive use and deployment of power electronics converters (PECs) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%