2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01228-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic incomparability of infinite-dimensional entangled states

Abstract: In support of a recent conjecture by Nielsen (1999), we prove that the phenomena of 'incomparable entanglement'-whereby, neither member of a pair of pure entangled states can be transformed into the other via local operations and classical communication (LOCC)-is a generic feature when the states at issue live in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vidal extended this to the case of probabilistic local conversion (SLOCC) of two pure bipartite entangled states [5]. Further, Morikoshi [6] investigated the recovery of entanglement loss in the process of local conversion and several other groups studied the possibility and impossibility of entanglement manipulation in different context [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vidal extended this to the case of probabilistic local conversion (SLOCC) of two pure bipartite entangled states [5]. Further, Morikoshi [6] investigated the recovery of entanglement loss in the process of local conversion and several other groups studied the possibility and impossibility of entanglement manipulation in different context [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconvertibility.-Nielsen conjectured that the probability of picking at random a pair of incomparable spectra in a d-system tends to 1 as d → ∞ [2]. It was established that densely many of these are in fact strongly incomparable [11]. Our objective is to find for a single spectrum its ratio of incomparable spectra in the Weyl chamber.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First educed by Nielsen [6], majorization incomparability was used to account for the restrictions placed on entanglement transformation. Work has been done to uncover its underlying nature [10][11][12][13], however such understanding is far from exhaustion. Here, we examine majorization incomparability under a quantum setting in hopes of facilitating such discussions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%