2013
DOI: 10.1080/0965254x.2013.817475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic, genuine, or completely new? Branding strategies to leverage new products

Abstract: This research presents a framework for branding new products that distinguishes between combining a parent brand with a generic sub-brand that is little more than product category identifier, combining a parent brand with a genuine sub-brand that creates associations unique to the new product, and developing a completely new brand with no reference to the parent brand. Within the framework, branding strategies for new products depend on the fit of the new product category with product categories in which the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study is motivated by the desire to better understand the risks associated with the launch of line extensions in the luxury sector by testing the impact of different types of branding strategies on luxury consumer purchase intentions. Scholars have addressed direct brands vs sub-brands (Boisvert and Burton, 2011;Jo, 2007;Kim et al, 2001;Milberg et al, 1997;Rahman and Areni, 2014) or new independent brands (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000;Rahman and Areni, 2014). A direct brand extension predominantly maintains the parent brand name with an additional name or label (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is motivated by the desire to better understand the risks associated with the launch of line extensions in the luxury sector by testing the impact of different types of branding strategies on luxury consumer purchase intentions. Scholars have addressed direct brands vs sub-brands (Boisvert and Burton, 2011;Jo, 2007;Kim et al, 2001;Milberg et al, 1997;Rahman and Areni, 2014) or new independent brands (Aaker and Joachimsthaler, 2000;Rahman and Areni, 2014). A direct brand extension predominantly maintains the parent brand name with an additional name or label (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common forms of brand architecture includes a mix of the two approaches described above (Rajagopal and Sanchez, 2004;Laforet and Saunders, 2007;Laforet and Saunders, 1994). Examples include endorsement strategy (Olins, 1989), subbrands/ endorsement (Aaker and Joachimstahler, 2000;Rahman and Areni, 2014), mixed branding (Rao et al, 2004), range/umbrella branding (Kapferer, 1992) and business branding (Muzellec and Lambkin, 2009), all of which contain the presence of a corporate brand but with varying degrees of product brand dependency based on how the corporate brand is positioned alongside a subbrand (Rahman and Areni, 2014) such as Toyota Corolla, a co-brand (Simonin and Ruth, 1998) such as the Adidas Porsche sneaker or an endorsed brand such as Park Inn by Radisson. This architecture provides marketers with an "in between" option of attaining broad market coverage and some synergy (Barwise and Robertson, 1992) while maintaining the freedom to extend or modify the brand positioning in relation to the corporate brand.…”
Section: Different Types Of Brand Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the biggest predictors of the market reaction to product recalls has been the reputation of the firm; firms with a positive reputation suffer the most because their expectations are violated by a product recall (Rhee and Haunschild, 2006). However, new products represent a new challenge because they contain more novel elements than established products and they are developing their own reputation which may be different from the reputation of the firm (Rahman and Areni, 2014). Our paper takes a novel approach by examining the rate of recall for new products and how reputation of the firm and the product may impact the market response to the product recall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%