2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03973-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic Entity Resolution in Relational Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] adapts the algorithms to a distributed environment. Our generic ER algorithms for relational databases were published in [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] adapts the algorithms to a distributed environment. Our generic ER algorithms for relational databases were published in [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the 1st feature combination of Section 7.1, not using the address and phone number attributes, and using strict attribute equality-based feature match. Figure 2 also provides an inaccurate, but useful overview of several ER algorithms on client data, namely the following: -Java-F-Swoosh: a Java implementation of the best previously known generic entity resolution algorithm (F-Swoosh [2]), -DB-GER: our best relational entity resolution algorithm, based on a commercial relational database (see [35]), -index-ER-BDB: our best efficient indexing algorithm built on Java and Berkeley DB (see [36]), -MapReduce: our best distributed ER algorithm using 15 computer nodes and Hadoop implementation.…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%