2020
DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2020v12i9.38804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic Drug: Prescriber’s Perspective

Abstract: Objective: Knowledge of doctors and their understanding of generic drugs could facilitate in recognizing potential barriers to larger generic medicine prescriptions. Hence, the primary objective of this study was focused to explore knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of doctors toward generic medicines. Methods: It is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. The study participants are the doctors working in the hospital during the study period (2016–2017). The questionnaire designed for this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the physicians from both groups perceived that generic drugs have the same ingredients, are equally effective and safe as branded drugs. These results were consistent with similar studies conducted in India by Hadia et al [ 9 ] and Wahlang et al [ 12 ] However, there were some distinctions between the groups. Nearly 40% of government physicians did not favour interchangeability between generic and branded drugs as compared to only 20% among private physicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The majority of the physicians from both groups perceived that generic drugs have the same ingredients, are equally effective and safe as branded drugs. These results were consistent with similar studies conducted in India by Hadia et al [ 9 ] and Wahlang et al [ 12 ] However, there were some distinctions between the groups. Nearly 40% of government physicians did not favour interchangeability between generic and branded drugs as compared to only 20% among private physicians.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%