2018
DOI: 10.1038/s42004-017-0001-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic approach to access barriers in dehydrogenation reactions

Abstract: The introduction of linear energy correlations, which explicitly relate adsorption energies of reaction intermediates and activation energies in heterogeneous catalysis, has proven to be a key component in the computational search for new and promising catalysts. A simple linear approach to estimate activation energies still requires a significant computational effort. To simplify this process and at the same time incorporate the need for enhanced complexity of reaction intermediates, we generalize a recently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is in close agreement with an experimentally determined barrier of 1.21 eV. 90 The herein computed DFT barrier for the 9-9-9 site is consistent with barriers reported in the theoretical literature for the Pt(111), Ea=2.53-2.73 eV, [79][80][81][82] with the slightly lower barrier found here resulting from the use of a different TS-identification method (fixed bond-length 91 NEB compared to climbing-image NEB, see Methods). While Figure 5 suggest that our proposed model performs well with regards to trends in energetics and rates within one type of site, the model is inconsistent with DFT when comparing rates between different types of sites.…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The latter is in close agreement with an experimentally determined barrier of 1.21 eV. 90 The herein computed DFT barrier for the 9-9-9 site is consistent with barriers reported in the theoretical literature for the Pt(111), Ea=2.53-2.73 eV, [79][80][81][82] with the slightly lower barrier found here resulting from the use of a different TS-identification method (fixed bond-length 91 NEB compared to climbing-image NEB, see Methods). While Figure 5 suggest that our proposed model performs well with regards to trends in energetics and rates within one type of site, the model is inconsistent with DFT when comparing rates between different types of sites.…”
Section: Critical Evaluation Of the Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The costliest part of the first principles calculations is associated with identifying transition states, needed for the calculation of the respective activation energies. Therefore significant effort has focused on increasing the efficiency of BEP relationships and generalizing them [20,33–35] . Recent promising approaches have combined BEP relationships with machine learning approaches and significantly increased the accuracy of predicted activation energies for a large dataset of various reactions [34,35] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore significant effort has focused on increasing the efficiency of BEP relationships and generalizing them. [20,[33][34][35] Recent promising approaches have combined BEP relationships with machine learning approaches and significantly increased the accuracy of predicted activation energies for a large dataset of various reactions. [34,35] However, the chosen descriptors either had no physical meaning, [35] or the focus was only on a limited number of reactions, [34,36] both significantly limiting general applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of explicit DFT calculations and simple modeling methods such as scaling relationships has proven to be an essential tool in the computational search for new and promising catalysts. The scaling relationships can be viewed as the correlation between a descriptor and the transition-state (TS) energy of a specific reaction, with descriptors typically being the final-state (FS) or adsorption energies of one or a few key intermediates. ,, For the C–H bond activation and (de)­hydrogenation reactions of alkanes, several scaling relationships have been proposed. ,,,, One of the first attempts to generalize a set of de­(hydrogenation) reactions for several reactants including methane, ethane, and propane over close-packed and stepped surfaces of TMs was proposed by Wang et al Therein, with a suitable choice of reference systems, the TS scaling relationship was approximated to just one single linear scaling relationship (LSR). LSRs between the FS energies and the corresponding TS energies have been used to understand the effect of coadsorbed species on metal surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%