2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic and sequence-variant specific molecular assays for the detection of the highly variable Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of GLRaV‐3 isolates was carried out by combining a multiplex RT‐PCR protocol with the partial sequencing of two genomic regions, and allowed the identification in Galicia of viral variants from four of the main six currently recognized phylogenetic groups (groups I to VI; Bester et al ., ; Chooi et al ., ,b). The distribution of the GLRaV‐3 isolates in the five selected vineyards is differential, reflecting the different vines and the cultivation history at each particular vineyard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The detection of GLRaV‐3 isolates was carried out by combining a multiplex RT‐PCR protocol with the partial sequencing of two genomic regions, and allowed the identification in Galicia of viral variants from four of the main six currently recognized phylogenetic groups (groups I to VI; Bester et al ., ; Chooi et al ., ,b). The distribution of the GLRaV‐3 isolates in the five selected vineyards is differential, reflecting the different vines and the cultivation history at each particular vineyard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another survey in New Zealand, groups I and VI were predominant in germplasm banks and in commercial vineyards (Chooi et al ., ). Phylogenetic analysis of the CP region from the set of 185 GenBank isolates showed that group I variants are the most frequent (57·8%), followed by group II (24·3%) and group III (14%), although the representation of GLRaV‐3 variants in the databases could be biased as the tools to detect group VI variants were only recently developed (Sharma et al ., ; Bester et al ., ; Chooi et al ., ,b) and divergent variants are probably underrepresented (Seah et al ., ; Goszczynski, ). Groups I and II were the most common in Galicia, as apparently is the case in the rest of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group I genetic variants were found to be dominant in a Chinese survey (Farooq et al, 2012), while in Portugal groups I and II were the most common (Gouveia et al, 2009). In a New Zealand study, group I and VI-like (similar to NZ2) variants occurred predominantly in a germplasm and commercial vineyard block, while the group VI variant was only found in high numbers in the germplasm block (Chooi et al, 2013b). …”
Section: Genetic Variants Of Glrav-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genomic RNA of GLRaV-3 is found to be heterogeneous and up to date six genetic variants of the virus have been reported (Jooste et al, 2010; Gouveia et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2011; Kumar et al, 2012). Due to this genomic variability, two different multiplex PCRs were described for the detection and differentiation of four and five of the genetic variant groups of GLRaV-3, respectively (Bester et al, 2012b; Chooi et al, 2012). Another approach to PCR is called immunocapture PCR (IC-PCR).…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%