2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1145-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic and disease-specific estimates of quality of life in macular degeneration: mapping the MacDQoL onto the EQ-5D-3L

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms degeneration. This paper presents the first mapping algorithm to predict EQ-5D from 4 responses to the MacDQoL instrument. 5Methods: Responses to the MacDQoL and EQ-5D-3L instruments from 482 patients 6 were collected from the IVAN multicentre trial of two alternative drug treatments … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes two papers that were published online in 2016 and published in print in 2017. Of the 17 papers, one fulfilled all the reporting criteria [ 28 ] and one fulfilled all the criteria at least partially [ 32 ]. There was wide variation in the quality of reporting between papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes two papers that were published online in 2016 and published in print in 2017. Of the 17 papers, one fulfilled all the reporting criteria [ 28 ] and one fulfilled all the criteria at least partially [ 32 ]. There was wide variation in the quality of reporting between papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacDQoL and LLD are the AMD-specific tools that are considered to be more sensitive than the generic instrument. 39 All of the three instruments are widely used, and could be the preventives of current paper-pencil questionnaires for assessing QoL of patients with AMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAE and RMSE were calculated in this validation analysis. This approach has been widely used in internal validation and commonly referred to as a cross-validation approach in the literature [12, 13]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%