The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generativity and social value orientation between rural and urban societies in a developing country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, SVO is different among the urban area, rural areas and overall sample, as the percentages of proself subjects are 84%, 64% and 70%, respectively. The result is consistent with the previous literature in the sense that the percentage of proself people becomes higher in urban areas than in rural areas [8,21,59]. Another difference is in the average year of education, as urban subjects have 12.68 years (SD = 4.91), rural subjects have 8.97 years (SD = 3.86) and overall subjects in the sample have 9.95 years (SD = 4.47) on average.…”
Section: Social Value Orientationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, SVO is different among the urban area, rural areas and overall sample, as the percentages of proself subjects are 84%, 64% and 70%, respectively. The result is consistent with the previous literature in the sense that the percentage of proself people becomes higher in urban areas than in rural areas [8,21,59]. Another difference is in the average year of education, as urban subjects have 12.68 years (SD = 4.91), rural subjects have 8.97 years (SD = 3.86) and overall subjects in the sample have 9.95 years (SD = 4.47) on average.…”
Section: Social Value Orientationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Economic theory establishes that urbanization brings about an increase in people's income, potentially implying that economic growth with urbanization has a positive effect on happiness along with our result as well as those of the previous literature [31,[75][76][77][78][79]. However, behavioral sciences and social psychology report that urbanization is changing human societies in the way that people's generativity declines, the so-called "generativity crisis" [8,80]. Sasaki [80] claims that rapid economic growth, urbanization and social changes in Japan have led to a decline in people's generativity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, plan-makers and decision-makers could evaluate the social equity of industrial transformation through examining HIS in rural development. The social aspect of rural development is relatively more important than economic growth compared with urban areas, which replicates the disparity of prosociality between rural and urban residents in developing counties [77]. The fishery industry brings relatively higher income than tourism at this beginning stage, however, the workload and environment of homestay offices and fishing-boats is entirely different.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%