2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/sies.2009.5196194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative programming with support for formal verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proper investigation of the C code is beyond the scope of this paper. In our previous work [7], we show that the memory footprint is not heavily affected by the fact that the program was generated from abstract high level description. Of course, hand-written C code may be more efficient, mainly because of manual memory management.…”
Section: Generated C Codementioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proper investigation of the C code is beyond the scope of this paper. In our previous work [7], we show that the memory footprint is not heavily affected by the fact that the program was generated from abstract high level description. Of course, hand-written C code may be more efficient, mainly because of manual memory management.…”
Section: Generated C Codementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Whereas standard Python programs use locks from POSIX threads, Java uses its own monitors. In our parlib library, we implemented monitors for Python programs; see also our previous work [7]. Significant advantage of this method is that Java native monitors help Java Pathfinder to perform state-space optimizations because it is optimized for this lock semantics.…”
Section: B Our Toolchainmentioning
confidence: 99%