2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.2992873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative Principal Component Thermography for Enhanced Defect Detection and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the fraction of subgrain boundary is relatively high in BM (Figure 15). The subgrain boundaries were also treated as the barriers against the dislocation movements, improving the strength and fatigue resistance of BM [23,24]. However, the fatigue crack propagation was determined by a transgranular-intergranular mixed mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the fraction of subgrain boundary is relatively high in BM (Figure 15). The subgrain boundaries were also treated as the barriers against the dislocation movements, improving the strength and fatigue resistance of BM [23,24]. However, the fatigue crack propagation was determined by a transgranular-intergranular mixed mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Liu et al [ 31 ] introduced an approach that uses data augmentation generated by the deep-learning models. The assumption was that deep-learning models would be able to learn statistical features from the data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For IRT defect identification, several thermographic data analysis methods have been developed to enhance the visibility of defects in thermograms. These methods include principal component thermography (PCT) [ 10 ] and its variants (such as sparse PCT [ 11 ], candid covariance-free incremental PCT [ 12 ], generative PCT [ 13 ]), thermographic signal reconstruction [ 14 ], penalized least squares [ 15 ], pulsed phase thermography [ 16 ], independent component thermography [ 17 ], manifold learning methods [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], autoencoder methods [ 21 , 22 ], other deep learning methods [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], etc. Most of the above-mentioned methods can be considered as a kind of metric learning [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge of thermographic data analysis is that the thermograms are typically limited because of the shallow detection depth of the thermal imager, which indeed restricts the defect detection capabilities of thermal imaging methods. While this difficulty is solved by using a data expansion strategy in the generative PCT (GPCT) approach [ 13 ], there is still room for improvement in the performance of defect identification because the nonlinearity of thermal image data is not considered in it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%