2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/5/052002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of user defined turbulent inflow conditions by an active grid for validation experiments

Abstract: Abstract. A wind tunnel experiment is presented which combines the use of controlled turbulent inflow conditions and a two-bladed model wind turbine utilizing a new control strategy called subspace predictive repetitive control (SPRC). The validation of the performance of SPRC was made under turbulent inflow conditions generated by an active grid. The 3m × 3m active grid is used in this experiment using a unique method to generate reproducible atmosphericlike turbulent wind fields to act on a medium sized mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments were carried out in Oldenburg's Large Wind Tunnel (OLWiT), a closed-loop wind tunnel that has an inlet of (3 × 3) m 2 and a closed test section of 30 m length (cf. [28]). Wind velocities of up to 42 ms −1 can be achieved, and the background turbulence intensity is 0.3%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were carried out in Oldenburg's Large Wind Tunnel (OLWiT), a closed-loop wind tunnel that has an inlet of (3 × 3) m 2 and a closed test section of 30 m length (cf. [28]). Wind velocities of up to 42 ms −1 can be achieved, and the background turbulence intensity is 0.3%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many new experiments were initiated, which are summarized in a recent review by Mydlarski (2017). Alternating the excitation methods, grids are used (a) to generate homogeneous and isotropic turbulence (HIT) (see Mydlarski andWarhaft 1996, 1998;Shen and Warhaft 2000;Poorte and Biesheuvel 2002;Larssen and Devenport 2011;Hearst and Lavoie 2015;Griffin et al 2019;Cekli et al 2015), (b) to create a defined shear flow in the wind tunnel (see Cekli and van de Water 2010;Hearst and Ganapathisubramani 2017), and (c) to reproduce atmospheric wind conditions either directly (see Reinke et al 2017;Kröger et al 2018a) or by their statistical properties (see Knebel et al 2011;Good and Warhaft 2011;Neuhaus et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present experimental setup can be further improved, for an even increased realism and expanded capabilities. Regarding the inflow, several facilities have been recently designed or upgraded to generate unstable boundary layers (Chamorro and Porté-Agel, 2010), tornadoes and downbursts (WindEEE, 2020), or for the active generation of turbulent flows (Kröger et al, 2018). Regarding the models, a more realistic geometry and size of the nacelle and tower can be achieved at the price of a further miniaturization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%