2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of the1H in H2O neutron thermal scattering law covariance matrix of the CAB model

Abstract: The thermal scattering law (TSL) of 1H in H2O describes the interaction of the neutron with the hydrogen bound to light water. No recommended procedure exists for computing covariances of TSLs available in the international evaluated nuclear data libraries. This work presents an analytic methodology to produce such a covariance matrix-associated to the water model developed at the Atomic Center of Bariloche (Centro Atomico Bariloche, CAB, Argentina). This model is called as CAB model, it calculates the TSL of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noticing that for skewed distributions with a strong kurtosis, as the majority of cases presented here, one standard deviation does not refer to 68% of the population: for lct8.5, 68.3% of the cases are within the mean ±1σ, but for lst2.1, 73% are within the mean ±1σ. One can also compare the present results for the lct and pst benchmarks with the values presented in reference [27]. In this reference, uncertainties due to TSL for the MISTRAL-1 experiment, similar to the lct benchmarks, range from 70 to 150 pcm.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Other Momentsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noticing that for skewed distributions with a strong kurtosis, as the majority of cases presented here, one standard deviation does not refer to 68% of the population: for lct8.5, 68.3% of the cases are within the mean ±1σ, but for lst2.1, 73% are within the mean ±1σ. One can also compare the present results for the lct and pst benchmarks with the values presented in reference [27]. In this reference, uncertainties due to TSL for the MISTRAL-1 experiment, similar to the lct benchmarks, range from 70 to 150 pcm.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Other Momentsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The uncertainty propagation method is the Total Monte Carlo method [25], leading to k eff uncertainties (later called ∆k eff ), corresponding to one standard deviation of the observed probability density functions (pdf), as well as higher moments. Similar works on uncertainty propagation and covariance generation for TSL can be found in references [26,27]. In the first reference, the TMC method (and fast TMC) was applied, whereas the second reference defines TSL covariance matrices, with an application to UO 2 and MOX fuels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved results were obtained by using the CAB model for water established at the nuclear center of Bariloche (Argentina) thanks to Molecular Dynamic simulations. The correlation matrix between the Molecular Dynamic parameters obtained from the least-squares fit of neutron data are discussed in reference [45].…”
Section: Miscellaneous Model Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) parameters to data, 3,4 or analytical fitting of molecular dynamics (MD) model parameters to data. 5 The latter two studies explicitly state that although they provided covariances for their respective parameters, they did not change the values of their parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with previous works that constrained the fit to the phonon density of states 4 or the average cosine of the scattering angle and total cross section. 5 Although the method can generate covariance matrix data for any property used in the evaluation procedure [including Sðα; βÞ], this work focuses on generating covariance data for the phonon density of states. While there are several groups looking into thermal scattering covariances [e.g., the General Nuclear Database Structure and Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Cooperation (WPEC) subgroup 42/44/48], there is no agreedupon method for generating or storing thermal scattering covariance data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%