2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of Single-Cell Transcript Variability by Repression

Abstract: SummaryGene expression levels vary greatly within similar cells, even within clonal cell populations [1]. These spontaneous expression differences underlie cell fate diversity in both differentiation and disease [2]. The mechanisms responsible for generating expression variability are poorly understood. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we show that transcript variability emerging during Dictyostelium differentiation is driven predominantly by repression rather than activation. The increased variability of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(55 reference statements)
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the correlation analysis between the cell transcriptional uncertainty and biologically meaningful rates of the stochastic gene transcription model showed strong positive correlations with transcriptional burst size and frequency. In agreement with the result of the correlation analysis, several studies have reported an increase in gene transcriptional bursts during transition states in cell differentiation and other recent studies have suggested that both burst frequency and burst size regulate gene expression levels 33,51,52 . Importantly, our comparison of the single-cell transcriptional uncertainty and the single-cell RNA velocity revealed that an increase (decrease) in RNA velocity predicts an increase (decrease) in transcriptional uncertainty after a short delay, and that a peak of RNA velocity preceeds that of the transcriptional uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the correlation analysis between the cell transcriptional uncertainty and biologically meaningful rates of the stochastic gene transcription model showed strong positive correlations with transcriptional burst size and frequency. In agreement with the result of the correlation analysis, several studies have reported an increase in gene transcriptional bursts during transition states in cell differentiation and other recent studies have suggested that both burst frequency and burst size regulate gene expression levels 33,51,52 . Importantly, our comparison of the single-cell transcriptional uncertainty and the single-cell RNA velocity revealed that an increase (decrease) in RNA velocity predicts an increase (decrease) in transcriptional uncertainty after a short delay, and that a peak of RNA velocity preceeds that of the transcriptional uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…One possible explanation for such change in model parameters is a higher chromatin accessibility during the transition period of cell differentiation. This finding is consistent with the view that stem cells increase its gene expression uncertainty or stochasticity by adopting a more open chromatin state to enable the exploration of the gene expression space 33,[50][51][52] .…”
Section: As Depicted Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, in mouse ES The underlying transcriptional variability that accompanies capture of the mid-Nanog transition state is reminiscent of other transition events associated with enhanced heterogeneity [2,3,5,7]. Recently, it was suggested that heterogeneity of expression levels occurs primarily in genes which decrease their expression at fate decisions [34], but that this heterogeneity resolves on commitment to a stable, differentiated state, requiring a dynamic means of transcriptional regulation. In line with this view, Ahrends et al [1] have modelled the contribution of transcriptional noise during commitment and progression and adipocyte differentiation and found that while low levels of noise ensure lineage commitment, noise must be limited for differentiation to progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a larger fraction of cells express very high levels of multiple marker genes compared to the bulk population than one would expect for a normal distribution ( Figure S1A ). Importantly, this type of single cell variability, which is characterized by rare and coordinated large deviations in the expression of multiple genes, is conceptually distinct from the classical "noise" models of non-genetic single cell variability using probabilistic models of gene regulation (Antolović et al, 2017;Chen and Larson, 2016;Corrigan et al, 2016;Golding et al, 2005;Raj and van Oudenaarden, 2008;So et al, 2011;Symmons and Raj, 2016;Thattai and van Oudenaarden, 2001) . Specifically, the classical models have largely described the variability that results in relatively normally distributed counts of mRNAs of a given gene per cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%