2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01808.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of microdamage around endosseous implants

Abstract: The results of this study suggest that most of the microcracks were generated by the osteotomy preparation and the other modalities did not appear to have any major additional effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although microdamage accumulation and increased bone remodeling are clearly evidenced in peri-screw bone [1], [2], [13], [17], [19], [26], [27], [28], [29], little is known about the repair mode for microdamage induced by screw insertion. Like fatigue damage, both linear cracks and diffuse damage were visible in peri-screw bone [1], [2], [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although microdamage accumulation and increased bone remodeling are clearly evidenced in peri-screw bone [1], [2], [13], [17], [19], [26], [27], [28], [29], little is known about the repair mode for microdamage induced by screw insertion. Like fatigue damage, both linear cracks and diffuse damage were visible in peri-screw bone [1], [2], [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like fatigue damage, both linear cracks and diffuse damage were visible in peri-screw bone [1], [2], [28]. It has been reported that diffuse damage is much less effective for triggering bone resorption than linear cracks, suggesting that the responses to diffuse damage and linear cracks are different [21], [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive tension may cause irreversible damage to the periimplant bone tissue (6). Conversely, too low tension may unsatisfactorily stimulate the bone repair process (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies have demonstrated a close relationship between initial stabilization and the success of an osseointegrated implant (11)(12)(13), which can be measured by the insertion torque during implant placement (12). The insertion torque must exceed 30 Ncm to obtain predictable success rates (12,14), aiming at avoiding implant micromovement and consequent connective tissue formation (6,13). However, an excessively high insertion torque, above 50 Ncm (15), can occur during dense bone implant placement (12,16,17), resulting in the transmission of high compressive stresses to the adjacent bone, in addition to compromising osseointegration success (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the time of implant insertion is too short for bone to relax, the bone tissue might experience inelastic phenomena with the possibility of permanent elastic strains in periimplant bone (Duyck et al 2010;Natali et al 2009). Research has also supported the hypothesis that implant insertion may cause initiation of microcracks in peri-implant bone (Huja et al 1999;Warreth et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%