2006
DOI: 10.1142/s0129054106004352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of Languages by Rewriting Systems That Resemble Automata

Abstract: This paper introduces and discusses ^-rewriting systems, which represent languagegenerating devices that resemble automata by using finitely many states without any nonterminals. It demonstrates that these systems characterize the well-known infinite hierarchy of language families resulting from programmed grammars of finite index in a very natural way. In its conclusion, this paper suggests some variants of #-rewriting systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5.4) represent a classical grammatical model of regulation, which has been covered in this monograph in detail. On the other hand, #-rewriting systems have been introduced relatively recently (see [80,81,83,85,87]). These systems generate languages just like any grammars.…”
Section: Combining Regulated Grammars and Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5.4) represent a classical grammatical model of regulation, which has been covered in this monograph in detail. On the other hand, #-rewriting systems have been introduced relatively recently (see [80,81,83,85,87]). These systems generate languages just like any grammars.…”
Section: Combining Regulated Grammars and Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, like regulated automata, they use simple state-based regulation during their language-generation process. These systems characterize an infinite hierarchy of language families resulting from programmed grammars of finite index (see [85]). As a result, to put it from a broader perspective, regulated systems of this combined kind are naturally related to some classical results about formal languages, on which they can shed light in an alternative way.…”
Section: Combining Regulated Grammars and Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%