2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-005-2068-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of custom modes in a Nd:YAG laser with a semipassive bimorph adaptive mirror

Abstract: Custom modes at a wavelength of 1064 nm were generated with a deformable mirror. The required surface deformations of the adaptive mirror were calculated with the Collins integral written in a matrix formalism. The appropriate size and shape of the actuators as well as the needed stroke were determined to ensure that the surface of the controllable mirror matches the phase front of the custom modes. A semipassive bimorph adaptive mirror with five concentric ring-shaped actuators and one defocus actuator was ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-cavity approaches, however, have seen much interest over a number of years [10][11][12] and are highly attractive for improving laser brightness, as they potentially offer better pump-to-mode overlap, thus enabling higher energy extraction with an improved beam quality at the output. There are several design configurations available that consider either low or higher order mode selection [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and particular to the selection of flattop beams (FTBs) for increased energy extraction and single-mode operation, there are several phase-only approaches that include the use of diffractive mirrors [20], graded-phase mirrors [21,22], diffractive elements [23], and intra-cavity deformable mirrors [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Other approaches include an intra-cavity amplitude filter [30], manipulation of the gain profile [31], an intra-cavity variable reflectivity mirror [32], and employing optical feedback in a microchip laser [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-cavity approaches, however, have seen much interest over a number of years [10][11][12] and are highly attractive for improving laser brightness, as they potentially offer better pump-to-mode overlap, thus enabling higher energy extraction with an improved beam quality at the output. There are several design configurations available that consider either low or higher order mode selection [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and particular to the selection of flattop beams (FTBs) for increased energy extraction and single-mode operation, there are several phase-only approaches that include the use of diffractive mirrors [20], graded-phase mirrors [21,22], diffractive elements [23], and intra-cavity deformable mirrors [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Other approaches include an intra-cavity amplitude filter [30], manipulation of the gain profile [31], an intra-cavity variable reflectivity mirror [32], and employing optical feedback in a microchip laser [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External approaches using SLMs and DMDs have dynamic control built into them, reaching speeds of several kHz. It has long been possible to achieve dynamic control inside lasers using adaptive mirrors, first demonstrated for active transverse mode control inside a solid‐state laser, but the limited dynamic range and the lack of a reference wavefront has limited applications for the direct creation of structured light, with only a few studies on creating structured light fields (mostly super‐Gaussian beams) . Instead, intracavity adaptive optical solutions have primarily focused on dynamic phase control for beam quality and brightness optimization .…”
Section: Structured Light Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deviation is most pronounced between φ = 10 • − 30 • . Intuitively beam-shaping (like e.g., in [8]) is expected to be done the best in this region, since the phase-front distortion is strongest. A physically more meaningful crucial parameter is the energy theoretically needed to superpose to the field to reach a phase conjugation…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%