1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.476174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of charge carriers and formation of antisymmetric double electric layers in glycerine

Abstract: Effects of induced steric hindrance on the dielectric behavior and H bonding in the supercooled liquid and vitreous alcoholThe effect of increasing ͑by more than one order of magnitude͒ of the conductivity of glycerine under the action of a low-frequency electric field (10 Ϫ4 -10 Ϫ3 Hz) and heating is discovered and investigated. The transition into the high-conductivity state is accompanied by formation of asymmetric double electric layers at the electrodes. Parameters of the electric barrier at the interface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from the table that the difference in the n value for each barrier is smaller than that observed for the values of the barrier height and thickness of the near-electrode layer W. In contrast to glycerol [8], it was difficult to estimate the concentration of molecules in the near-electrode area, because a mixture of liquid crystals was used, and it was not known what part of the total amount of the molecules in solution comprise the dye molecules in near-electrode area. However, based on comparison of the n values for the structure studied in this work with the results of [8], we can assume that almost all the molecules of the near-electrode layer are ionized. The main reason that leads to this effect is rather high value of electric field in the dense part of DEL.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows from the table that the difference in the n value for each barrier is smaller than that observed for the values of the barrier height and thickness of the near-electrode layer W. In contrast to glycerol [8], it was difficult to estimate the concentration of molecules in the near-electrode area, because a mixture of liquid crystals was used, and it was not known what part of the total amount of the molecules in solution comprise the dye molecules in near-electrode area. However, based on comparison of the n values for the structure studied in this work with the results of [8], we can assume that almost all the molecules of the near-electrode layer are ionized. The main reason that leads to this effect is rather high value of electric field in the dense part of DEL.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As a result of this analysis, the value R 2 − C S was estimated. Like to the case of glycerol [8], it reaches tens of MOhm, which by more than 5 orders of magnitude exceeds the resistance of the sample bulk part. Because these structures is two-barier, one can foresee that the series resistance for each barrier is the resistance of another barrier providing a current flows in the forward direction.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high values of permittivity ðe 0 > 10 5 Þ in the low frequency region might be caused by the non-uniform distribution of electrical field, because of blocking the electro-chemical processes of charge exchange at the interfaces [20,22]. Assuming that electric field is applied mainly to anode [20,22] and taking into account the approximation made in References [23,24] one can calculate thickness of the near-electrode charge exchange layers, d e :…”
Section: =[508]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the frequency dependence of ε' may be a complex process of polarization of PDLC as a heterogeneous medium. In this case, one should take into account not only the individual droplets of liquid, but also their interaction under the influence of an electric field [11]. It is important that for nano-PDLC the process of mutual polarization is pronounced significantly clearer than in the case of micro-PDLC.…”
Section: The Morphology Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%