2018
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2018.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of a precise Oct4-hrGFP knockin cynomolgus monkey model via CRISPR/Cas9-assisted homologous recombination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c, 1d, Table 1), concordant with the pattern seen in rhesus monkeys. For the sgRNA-predicted off-target sites, only one mutation (a 2-bp deletion) was seen in the knockin cynomolgus monkey as reported in Cai et al 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1c, 1d, Table 1), concordant with the pattern seen in rhesus monkeys. For the sgRNA-predicted off-target sites, only one mutation (a 2-bp deletion) was seen in the knockin cynomolgus monkey as reported in Cai et al 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…To evaluate the situation in monkeys, we performed trio WGS of Cas9-edited rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). We also analyzed the published trio WGS data of Cas9-edited cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative merits of these have been extensively reviewed elsewhere (Van Otterloo, Williams, & Artinger, 2016). Larger animal models can also be created including goats, pigs, and monkeys with CRISPR-Cas9 editing (Cui et al, 2018;Hai, Teng, Guo, Li, & Zhou, 2014;Ni et al, 2014). We favor the mouse models for a combination of accessible genetics, relative cost, fast generation time, and physical resemblance to human biology as compared to many other genetic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative merits of these have been extensively reviewed elsewhere, e.g., (Van Otterloo, Williams, & Artinger, 2016). Larger animal models can also be created including goats, pigs and monkeys with CRISPR-Cas9 editing (Cui et al, 2018; Hai, Teng, Guo, Li, & Zhou, 2014; Ni et al, 2014). We favor the mouse models for a combination of accessible genetics, relative cost, fast generation time, and physical resemblance to human biology as compared to many other genetic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%