2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr019141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of 3‐D hydrostratigraphic zones from dense airborne electromagnetic data to assess groundwater model prediction error

Abstract: We present a new methodology to combine spatially dense high‐resolution airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data and sparse borehole information to construct multiple plausible geological structures using a stochastic approach. The method developed allows for quantification of the performance of groundwater models built from different geological realizations of structure. Multiple structural realizations are generated using geostatistical Monte Carlo simulations that treat sparse borehole lithological observations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geostatistical simulation methods are most commonly used to create multiple realizations whose variability represents combined (uncertain) information, for instance, in order to estimate uncertainties of structural variability (Feyen and Caers, 2006;He et al, 2013;Poeter and Anderson, 2005;Refsgaard et al, 2012) or to make probability calculations to be used for various forecasts (Stafleu et al, 2011;Christensen et al, 2017). In this study (see Appendix A), only one realization of each of the conditional strategies has been presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostatistical simulation methods are most commonly used to create multiple realizations whose variability represents combined (uncertain) information, for instance, in order to estimate uncertainties of structural variability (Feyen and Caers, 2006;He et al, 2013;Poeter and Anderson, 2005;Refsgaard et al, 2012) or to make probability calculations to be used for various forecasts (Stafleu et al, 2011;Christensen et al, 2017). In this study (see Appendix A), only one realization of each of the conditional strategies has been presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AEM method has been used throughout the world for groundwater exploration and aquifer mapping (e.g., Sattel and Kgotlhang 2004;Podgorski et al 2013). The various methods that have been used to develop the hydrostratigraphic model are described in a recent paper by Christensen et al (2017) and include both knowledge-driven cognitive approaches (e.g., Jørgensen et al 2013) and geostatistical approaches (e.g., Marker et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostatistical simulation methods are most commonly used to create multiple realizations whose variability represents combined (uncertain) information, for instance, in order to estimate uncertainties of structural variability (Feyen and Caers, 2006;He et al, 2013;Poeter and Anderson, 2005;Refsgaard et al, 2012) or to make probability calculations to be used for various forecasts (Stafleu et al, 2011;Christensen et al, 2017). In this study (see Appendix A), only one realization of each of the conditional strategies has been presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%