The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1021/jo026666o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation and Reactivity toward Oxygen of Carbon-Centered Radicals Containing Indane, Indene, and Fluorenyl Moieties

Abstract: Resonance-stabilized radicals containing indane, indene, and fluorenyl moieties exhibit attenuated reactivity toward oxygen. Rate constants of approximately 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) were observed for the most stabilized radicals. The dependence of k(OX) (rate constant for radical trapping by oxygen) on the corresponding bond dissociation energies revealed that stereoelectronic effects are more important than steric effects in determining the low radical reactivity with oxygen. Scavenging by the nitroxide TEMPO was al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, RI 2 will be less stable than the intermediate corresponding to RI 1 , in which the conjugation between the phenyl group and the double bond is preserved (relative yield of secondary hydroperoxide a 63% and 64%, respectively). 17 It is clearly demonstrated by the present results that alkyl or phenyl substituents activate the C-H bond in the loneposition roughly by a factor of 1.7-7.3, depending on the It is interesting to note that when the substituent R was tbutyl-or phenyl- (substrates 1-4), a small amount, 2-5% of tertiary hydroperoxide b was formed (Table 1). However, when R was methyl or benzyl (substrates 5 and 6) the amount of tertiary hydroperoxide b increased substantially (relative yields of 36% and 20%, respectively).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Thus, RI 2 will be less stable than the intermediate corresponding to RI 1 , in which the conjugation between the phenyl group and the double bond is preserved (relative yield of secondary hydroperoxide a 63% and 64%, respectively). 17 It is clearly demonstrated by the present results that alkyl or phenyl substituents activate the C-H bond in the loneposition roughly by a factor of 1.7-7.3, depending on the It is interesting to note that when the substituent R was tbutyl-or phenyl- (substrates 1-4), a small amount, 2-5% of tertiary hydroperoxide b was formed (Table 1). However, when R was methyl or benzyl (substrates 5 and 6) the amount of tertiary hydroperoxide b increased substantially (relative yields of 36% and 20%, respectively).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At 5 × 10 –7 M, the accumulation of 4 • was not detectable, a behavior previously observed for other benzylic π radicals. 57 Instead of 4 • , a different species was formed, characterized by an absorption spectrum resembling that of 4 2 and a somewhat enhanced fluorescence ( Figure S4C ). This intermediate, which we presume to be the peroxide R–O–O–R ( Scheme 2 ), subsequently decayed to produce ketone 7 as the final oxidation product.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable radical TEMPO is often used to scavenge free radical pairs that escape the initial solvent cage and appeared applicable to the study of this reaction. [38,39] When this reaction was accordingly conducted in the presence of TEMPO, a significant impairment of formation of 8 was observed, CG-MS analysis showing the presence of TEMPO, TEMPO-H, and a small amount of compound 8. In addition, no trapping products formed from radical species and TEMPO were detected, but some other random free radical coupling products -such as tetraethyl ethane-1,1-diylbis(phosphonate), tetraethyl 2-hydroxyethane-1,1-diylbis(phosphonate), [(EtO) 2 P(O)] 2 , etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of ability of TEMPO for radical trapping, in spite of producing an inhibitory effect on the course of the reaction, has already been described. [38][39][40] These findings may be due either to steric hindrance of the TEMPO radical [38] or to thermal instability [39,40] of the coupling products. The addition of TEMPO or quinhydrone retards the formation of compound 8, which suggests that a radical mechanism was involved in this reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%