1977
DOI: 10.1021/ja00461a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation and properties of 4,9- and 3,8-methano[11]annulenylidenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the molecular orbital theory [39][40][41][42][43], chemical stability of all modified starch molecules is very high because the energy values of corresponding HOMO and LUMO are negative. Moreover, the difference in stability is easily understood in terms of the HOMO (Lewis base)-LUMO (Lewis acid) interaction; namely, a smaller HOMO-LUMO gap (Δ ) helps in more electrotransition in general, so it is unfavorable for the formation of a Lewis steady molecule.…”
Section: Chemical Stability Of Three Types Of Oxidized Starch-based Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the molecular orbital theory [39][40][41][42][43], chemical stability of all modified starch molecules is very high because the energy values of corresponding HOMO and LUMO are negative. Moreover, the difference in stability is easily understood in terms of the HOMO (Lewis base)-LUMO (Lewis acid) interaction; namely, a smaller HOMO-LUMO gap (Δ ) helps in more electrotransition in general, so it is unfavorable for the formation of a Lewis steady molecule.…”
Section: Chemical Stability Of Three Types Of Oxidized Starch-based Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, as pictured on the PES in Figure 2, the step of electron transfer (IM2-1 → IM3-1) is a completely endoergic process. This can be perfectly explained by the differential orbital energies, , [41][42][43][44] proposing that the smaller differential orbital energy corresponds to the easier reaction. As listed in Table 2, the difference decreases as the order of > > .…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the difference in stability of these adducts is easily understood in terms of the HOMO (Lewis base; i.e., CHX ·− /CX ·− 2 )-LUMO (Lewis acid; i.e., CHCl 3 ) interaction. According to the perturbation theory, [21][22][23][24][25] both a smaller HOMO-LUMO gap and a larger overlap between them results in a greater Lewis adduct stabilization. According to our theoretical investigations, we note that the energy of the HOMO decreases in the order (kJ mol −1 ) CHCl ·− (−136.53) > CHBr ·− (−162.78) > CHI ·− (−170.71) and CCl ·− 2 (−254.67) > CBr ·− 2 (−267.80) > CI ·− 2 (−286.24).…”
Section: Reamentioning
confidence: 99%