2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2019.00087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Reliable Friends via Adversarial Training to Improve Social Recommendation

Abstract: Most of the recent studies of social recommendation assume that people share similar preferences with their friends and the online social relations are helpful in improving traditional recommender systems. However, this assumption is often untenable as the online social networks are quite sparse and a majority of users only have a small number of friends. Besides, explicit friends may not share similar interests because of the randomness in the process of building social networks. Therefore, discovering a numb… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common ideas of MF-based social recommendation algorithms can be categorized into three groups: co-factorization methods [22,46], ensemble methods [20], and regularization methods [23]. Besides, there are also studies using socially-aware MF to model point-of-interest [48,51,52], preference evolution [39], item ranking [55,61], and relation generation [11,57]. Over the recent years, the boom of deep learning has broadened the ways to explore social recommendation.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Social Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common ideas of MF-based social recommendation algorithms can be categorized into three groups: co-factorization methods [22,46], ensemble methods [20], and regularization methods [23]. Besides, there are also studies using socially-aware MF to model point-of-interest [48,51,52], preference evolution [39], item ranking [55,61], and relation generation [11,57]. Over the recent years, the boom of deep learning has broadened the ways to explore social recommendation.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Social Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in a social recommender system, if a user has few interactions with items, the system would rely on her friends' interactions to infer her preference and generate better recommendations. Upon this paradigm, a large number of social recommendation models have been developed [12,21,23,55,57,61] and have shown stronger performance compared with general recommendation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSGAN [14]: It is a state-of-the-art graph convolutional network algorithm, which generates reliable friends by adversarial generative networks to alleviate the sparse problem of trust data and improve recommendation performance.…”
Section: ) Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, this will help the recommendation system to predict user preferences, but the noise reduction makes trust information more sparse, and the trust information with high sparsity can not improve the recommendation performance effectively. In the meantime, some works [12], [13], [48] attempt to alleviate the sparse problem by generating more trust information, for example, Yu et al [14] propose a Generative Adversarial Nets(GAN) to generate social information, GAN consists of two parts: a generator which is used to generate users trust friends; a discriminator which is used to discriminate whether the generated friends similar to user's real friends. Generate friends by the algorithm to alleviate the problem of sparse data, the following problem is, if GAN selects noisy trust data, it takes the model in the wrong direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GraphGAN [122] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ GAN-HBNR [11] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ VCGAN [145] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ UPGAN [48] 2020 ✓ ✓ ✓ Hybrid Collaborative Rec. VAE-AR [66] 2017 ✓ ✓ ✓ RGD-TR [71] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ aae-RS [136] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ SDNet [26] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ ATR [89] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ AugCF [127] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ RSGAN [138] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ RRGAN [24] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ UGAN [129] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ LARA [107] 2020 ✓ ✓ ✓ CGAN [28] 2020 ✓ ✓ ✓ Context-aware Rec. Temporal-aware RecGAN [8] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ NMRN-GAN [126] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ AAE [116] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ PLASTIC [147] 2018 [25] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ Geographical-aware Geo-ALM [75] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ APOIR [148] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ Cross-domain Rec.…”
Section: Model Namementioning
confidence: 99%