2017
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-16-0400.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Probabilistic Forecasts from Convection-Allowing Ensembles Using Neighborhood Approaches: A Review and Recommendations

Abstract: “Neighborhood approaches” have been used in two primary ways to postprocess and verify high-resolution ensemble output. While the two methods appear deceptively similar, they define events over different spatial scales and yield fields with different interpretations: the first produces probabilities interpreted as likelihood of event occurrence at the grid scale, while the second produces probabilities of event occurrence over spatial scales larger than the grid scale. Unfortunately, some studies have confused… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since most of the PERs showed similar cost functions in Equation , especially the last few ones, the principle used to select PERs in OPTP must be relaxed to include enough ensemble members. NEP significantly outperformed PRO in accuracy, reliability and discrimination for rainfall with smaller threshold, which was consistent with the conclusion of Schwartz and Sobash () that NEP typically does not possess good reliability or resolution for rare events because of sharpness loss.…”
Section: Results Of a Batch Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since most of the PERs showed similar cost functions in Equation , especially the last few ones, the principle used to select PERs in OPTP must be relaxed to include enough ensemble members. NEP significantly outperformed PRO in accuracy, reliability and discrimination for rainfall with smaller threshold, which was consistent with the conclusion of Schwartz and Sobash () that NEP typically does not possess good reliability or resolution for rare events because of sharpness loss.…”
Section: Results Of a Batch Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The UH between 0‐ and 1‐km AGL is defined as UH01km=0km1kmitalicζWdz, where ζ , W , z are vertical vorticity, vertical wind, and height (AGL), respectively. Figure shows the neighborhood maximum ensemble probabilities (Schwartz & Sobash, ) of high‐UH within 10 km of each point calculated with 51‐member ensemble forecasts in 1200–1300 JST. It was larger near the paths of the tornadoes in Z‐PTB than those in NZ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address this issue, spatial verification methods have been proposed, that aim at relaxing the constraint of an exact match between forecast and observed values at the grid scale (Gilleland et al ). An example is the neighbourhood approach (Schwartz and Sobash, ), which introduces spatial and/or temporal tolerances in the scores computation. Another method, intuitive to many users, consists of extracting from the forecast information at a larger, and thus more predictable, scale under the form of “precipitating objects”, which define areas where the distribution of precipitation is homogeneous (in terms of intensity and/or spatial distribution).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%