2016
DOI: 10.2200/s00703ed1v01y201602dtm043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Plans from Proofs: The Interpolation-based Approach to Query Reformulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is true even without result bounds, and follows from results in [13]: we give a self-contained argument here. Satisfiability for equality-free first-order constraints is undecidable [1].…”
Section: General First-order Constraintssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is true even without result bounds, and follows from results in [13]: we give a self-contained argument here. Satisfiability for equality-free first-order constraints is undecidable [1].…”
Section: General First-order Constraintssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Plans. We use plans to describe programs that use the access methods, formalizing them using the terminology of [14,13]. A monotone plan PL is a sequence of commands that produce temporary tables.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A first result we could prove in this direction is that every monotone boolean query expressible as a containment of N (all ) expressions is in fact expressible as the nonemptiness of an N (all ) expression. This may be seen as a preservation theorem, similar to, say, the theorem that the monotone first-order boolean queries are those expressible by positiveexistential sentences (allowing nonequalities) [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related is also query answering under access patterns, which require a relation to be accessed only by providing certain combinations of attributes [10,32,34]. This work differs from the prior work as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%