2006
DOI: 10.1126/science.1122858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Optical Schrödinger Kittens for Quantum Information Processing

Abstract: We present a detailed experimental analysis of a free-propagating light pulse prepared in a "Schrödinger kitten" state, which is defined as a quantum superposition of "classical" coherent states with small amplitudes. This kitten state is generated by subtracting one photon from a squeezed vacuum beam, and it clearly presents a negative Wigner function. The predicted influence of the experimental parameters is in excellent agreement with the experimental results. The amplitude of the coherent states can be amp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
852
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 846 publications
(865 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
9
852
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The most notable example is certainly their use for an optical quantum computer [10,11], alongside their employment for improving teleportation [12][13][14], cloning [15], and storage [16]. Several implementations of non-Gaussian states have been reported so far, in particular from squeezed light [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], close-tothreshold parametric oscillators [26,27] in optical cavities [28], and in superconducting circuits [29]. Non-Gaussian operations are also interesting for tasks such as entanglement distillation [30,31] and noiseless amplification [32,33], which are also obtained in a conditional fashion, accepting only those events heralded by a measurement result.…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most notable example is certainly their use for an optical quantum computer [10,11], alongside their employment for improving teleportation [12][13][14], cloning [15], and storage [16]. Several implementations of non-Gaussian states have been reported so far, in particular from squeezed light [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], close-tothreshold parametric oscillators [26,27] in optical cavities [28], and in superconducting circuits [29]. Non-Gaussian operations are also interesting for tasks such as entanglement distillation [30,31] and noiseless amplification [32,33], which are also obtained in a conditional fashion, accepting only those events heralded by a measurement result.…”
Section: Introduction and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported entanglement distillation, purification and Gaussification protocol can be iterated 7,8 and combined with already experimentally demonstrated single-photon subtraction [24][25][26] , quantum memory 3 and entanglement swapping 13,14 to build a continuous-variable quantum repeater. Our experiment is thus an important enabling step towards truly long-distance quantum communication with continuous variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our protocol enhances the entanglement and purity of the decohered states and represents a single step of an iterative Gaussification scheme 7,8 that asymptotically converts any input state into a Gaussian one. Moreover, if combined with a single de-Gaussifying operation such as the recently demonstrated single-photon subtraction from squeezed beams [24][25][26] , it would provide a generic continuous-variable entanglement purification and distillation scheme 7,8 , that is capable, for instance, of suppressing the detrimental effect of losses in quantum state transmission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the photon that causes the click comes from crystal I, then it is subtracted from the single-mode squeezed state, producing a negative Schrödinger cat in the CV mode [13,14,22]. The DV mode is in the vacuum state in this case, because of the low degree of two-mode squeezing obtained from crystal II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where |cat ± denote, respectively, positive and negative "Schrödinger cat" states N ± (|α ± |−α ) [13][14][15] in the CV mode C and {|0 D , |1 D } is the Fock basis for DV mode D, with N ± = 1/ √ 2 ± 2e −2α 2 being the normalization factor. The CV part of the resource (1) is distributed to Alice, while the DV part goes to Bob.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%