2017
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2017-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating monotone quantities for the heat equation

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to expose and further develop a simple yet surprisingly far-reaching framework for generating monotone quantities for positive solutions to linear heat equations in euclidean space. This framework is intimately connected to the existence of a rich variety of algebraic closure properties of families of sub/super-solutions, and more generally solutions of systems of differential inequalities capturing log-convexity properties such as the Li-Yau gradient estimate. Various applicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and thus f 0 can be thought of as a super type M function. The fact that u 0 is a supersolution as above follows from [11,Theorem 3.7] but the argument crucially rests on the proof of [15,Proposition 8.9]. We also remark that the condition (2.10) is natural and arises when considering the case when the Brascamp-Lieb constant is attained on gaussian inputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and thus f 0 can be thought of as a super type M function. The fact that u 0 is a supersolution as above follows from [11,Theorem 3.7] but the argument crucially rests on the proof of [15,Proposition 8.9]. We also remark that the condition (2.10) is natural and arises when considering the case when the Brascamp-Lieb constant is attained on gaussian inputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Section 3 contains several preliminary observations, mostly related to the heat-flow monotonicity approach that we will use to prove our main result in Theorem 2.1. Although the main body of the proof of Theorem 2.1 is given in Section 5, the key heat-flow result needed for the proof has been isolated in Theorem 4.1 in Section 4; we take the opportunity to present this result in the form of a "closure property" for sub/supersolutions to certain heat equations and thus contribute to the emerging theory of such closure properties in, for example, [1,10,11]. After the proof of Theorem 2.1 in Section 5, in Section 6 we present some further applications and remarks.…”
Section: A Regularized Version Of Barthe's Reverse Brascamp-lieb Ineq...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, that is combining heat flow and entropy formula, appeared more simplified than using either heat flow or entropy formula independently. The results obtained here can be compared with existing ones [5,11,18,25,26] . Another motivation for this work is that these inequalities can be easily seen as the consequence of the ability of functionals involving powers of smooth solution to the heat equation to approach their extremal values as time grows infinitely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…under appropriate smoothness and decay conditions on v. Observations of this nature emerged in [15,16] in the context of the sharp Young convolution inequality and Brascamp-Lieb inequalities. We follow these papers and refer to (3.36) as a closure property (for supersolutions of Fokker-Planck equations) associated with the operation v t → v t .…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lemma 2.2. Let p > 1, β > 0, and twice differentiable function v : R n → (0, ∞) 16). Then for a solution v t to (2.4), we have…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%