2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.050503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Haar-Uniform Randomness Using Stochastic Quantum Walks on a Photonic Chip

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then turn to a more challenging scenario of open QW interacting with a simulated environment ( 19 , 54 ). Decoherence can be introduced by inserting an extra phase gate trueR̂ (β)=ei2normalβnormalσtruê z with a fast fluctuating phase β ∈ [ − δβ, δβ] into each step of coherent QW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then turn to a more challenging scenario of open QW interacting with a simulated environment ( 19 , 54 ). Decoherence can be introduced by inserting an extra phase gate trueR̂ (β)=ei2normalβnormalσtruê z with a fast fluctuating phase β ∈ [ − δβ, δβ] into each step of coherent QW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While as a prototypical dynamical process, the open QW can model the dissipative evolution of quantum neural networks ( 11 , 12 ), and this simulation enables better performance to process various issues such as pattern recognition ( 13 ). Adding controlled noise into the quantum evolution, QW can be dynamically initialized in any high-dimensional form ( 14 – 17 ) and generate the Haar random unitary operators ( 18 , 19 ) required for quantum computation. Implementing the open QW and validating these noise-assisted computational and simulated performances demand a complete density-matrix characterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a true simulation of quantum systems is only feasible on another quantum system, called quantum simulator, which is normally less complex and more controllable than the system of interest [1]. Thanks to recent advancements in quantum technologies, quantum simulators are now emerging in various physical systems, including cold atoms [2][3][4][5], superconducting devices [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], ion-tarps [14][15][16], Rydberg atoms [17][18][19][20] and optical systems [21][22][23]. However, current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) simulators are far from being perfect [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital quantum simulators, in NISQ era, come with different levels of qubit connectivity and thus limited interactions between their qubits. In some physical setups, such as superconducting systems [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] or cold atoms in optical lattices [21][22][23], the connectivity is determined by the geometry of the simulator and is normally restricted to nearest neighbors. In other platforms, such as ion-traps [14][15][16] and Rydberg atoms [17][18][19][20], the connectivity is more versatile and in principle interactions can be induced between any pair of qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is experimentally simulated using an asymmetric three-dimensional (3D) photonic lattice, for the first time, to uncover how the excitation energy propagates between the seven BChla molecules, including both neighboring and non-neighboring interactions. The optical simulator is realized by a 3D waveguide array fabricated by the femtosecond laser direct writing (FLDW) possessing true 3D micromachining capability. By converting the temporal ( t ) energy transport into the spatial ( l ) evolution of light in waveguides through l = ct , we can intuitively reveal the efficient CET dynamics by excitation of BChl-6, which paves the way for its application to more integrated artificial light-harvesting devices, even multiport light harvesters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%