Proceedings. Twenty-Third Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (Cat. No.99CB37032)
DOI: 10.1109/cmpsac.1999.812687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating goal-oriented test cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Korel [13] indicated that most of the existing test data generators [14][15][16][17][18] use symbolic evaluation to derive test data, which may require complex algebraic manipulations, especially in the presence of arrays. Instead, he proposed a dynamic approach based on the actual execution of the program being tested, function minimization methods, and dynamic data flow analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korel [13] indicated that most of the existing test data generators [14][15][16][17][18] use symbolic evaluation to derive test data, which may require complex algebraic manipulations, especially in the presence of arrays. Instead, he proposed a dynamic approach based on the actual execution of the program being tested, function minimization methods, and dynamic data flow analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they acknowledge that test case generation can be slow, though this might have been because of the particular planner they employed in their study. In a follow up study, they develop their ideas further by showing how it is possible to utilize UML together with constraints on parameters and state transition diagrams to model the domain (Scheetz, von Mayrhauser, & France, 1999;von Mayrhauser, Scheetz, & Dahlman, 1999). The class methods of the UML model are mapped to operators and state transition diagrams together with propositional constraints provide information to define the preconditions and effects of operators.…”
Section: Ai Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%