Abstract:a b s t r a c t
Keywords:Global brands Brand equity Corporate social responsibility StakeholdersIn this paper, we argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) to various stakeholders (customers, shareholders, employees, suppliers, and community) has a positive effect on global brand equity (BE). In addition, policies aimed at satisfying community interests help reinforce the credibility of social responsibility policies with other stakeholders. We test these theoretical contentions by using panel data comp… Show more
“…Our results revealed no statistically significant relationship between CSR and brand value, thus reinforcing the conclusions of Torres et al (2012). Therefore, for our selected companies that implemented CSR activities could became difficult to determine whether CSR influences brand value or vice-versa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These benefits had been considered in many studies important key factors towards development of different CSR concepts. Researchers have tried to examine in their studies the effect of CSR on brand and failed or found inconclusive results (Torres et al, 2012). We argue that once a company integrates CSR activities in its core business strategies and is taken seriously, not as a fashion, CSR becomes a part of the company's brand, therefore increasing it.…”
This paper aims at exploring the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm performance and brand value for the companies covered within the top list of 50 U.S. companies for Social Responsibility drawn up by the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Reputation Institute, over the period 2008-2011. Moreover, this paper attempts to relate CSR with entrepreneurship, respectively Corporate Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship. Firm performance was measured both through accounting-based (return on assets and return on equity) and market-based firm performance measures (earnings per share). Brand value was proxied through Brand Finance data. CSR was reflected through the index developed by Carroll School of Management's Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College in conjunction with the Reputation Institute. By employing panel data regression models, there resulted a positive and statistically significant relationship between CSR and firm performance as proxied by return on assets. However, we notice the lack of any statistically significant relationships between CSR and return on equity, as well as CSR and earnings per share. Furthermore, there was found no association between CSR and brand value.
“…Our results revealed no statistically significant relationship between CSR and brand value, thus reinforcing the conclusions of Torres et al (2012). Therefore, for our selected companies that implemented CSR activities could became difficult to determine whether CSR influences brand value or vice-versa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These benefits had been considered in many studies important key factors towards development of different CSR concepts. Researchers have tried to examine in their studies the effect of CSR on brand and failed or found inconclusive results (Torres et al, 2012). We argue that once a company integrates CSR activities in its core business strategies and is taken seriously, not as a fashion, CSR becomes a part of the company's brand, therefore increasing it.…”
This paper aims at exploring the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm performance and brand value for the companies covered within the top list of 50 U.S. companies for Social Responsibility drawn up by the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Reputation Institute, over the period 2008-2011. Moreover, this paper attempts to relate CSR with entrepreneurship, respectively Corporate Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Entrepreneurship. Firm performance was measured both through accounting-based (return on assets and return on equity) and market-based firm performance measures (earnings per share). Brand value was proxied through Brand Finance data. CSR was reflected through the index developed by Carroll School of Management's Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College in conjunction with the Reputation Institute. By employing panel data regression models, there resulted a positive and statistically significant relationship between CSR and firm performance as proxied by return on assets. However, we notice the lack of any statistically significant relationships between CSR and return on equity, as well as CSR and earnings per share. Furthermore, there was found no association between CSR and brand value.
“…A possible explanation of this outcome is that ESG initiatives and performance may differ in their visibility, allowing firms to offset strategically. In this regard, Torres et al [61] showed that local social responsibility policies in communities generate brand value and foster the positive effect of corporate social responsibility toward other stakeholders, particularly customers. In line with this argument, those firms that concentrate their efforts to be leaders on those extra-financial categories that have the greatest visibility may increase the effectiveness of ESG practices to stakeholders and credibility to the firm, obtaining better economic performance than those firms that intends to stand equal or above their peers in all the extra-financial categories.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
This study aims to explore how environmental, social and governance (ESG) consistency impacts the firm performance, specifically, the relationship between ESG performance and economic performance (EP). This study posits that the company's commitment and effectiveness towards the creation of consistent competitive advantage in environmental, social and governance dimensions constitutes an intangible value that leads improvements in corporate performance. This work uses a panel dataset for listed firms of the EU-15 countries during the period 2002 to 2011 and applies Generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator system in order to address the potential unobserved heterogeneity and dynamic endogeneity. The main results reveal that the global effect of ESG performance on EP for those firms that present interdimensional consistency is greater than the rest, except for higher levels of ESG performance.
“…This is valid also when talking about markets and customers (Torres et al 2012;Vallaster et al 2012;Macleod 2001;Mohr et al 2001). When a firm acts in the abovementioned fields, the definition of the sum of the concerns affecting its strategy is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which has been actively implemented by companies over the last few decades (Candelo et al 2014).…”
Section: From Corporate Social Responsibility To the Territory Value mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.