2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating functional property variation in lentil (Lens culinaris) flour by seed micronization: Effects of seed moisture level and surface temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This change in structure is also reflected indirectly by a positive correlation with surface charge (r = .721, p < .01) and a negative correlation with solubility (r = À.947, p > .001) in the case of chickpea flour (Table 3). Pathiratne et al (2015) also reported that the water holding capacity of lentil flour increased from~0.8 to~0.9 and 1.0 g/g when tempered to 15% moisture and infrared heated to 115 and 130°C, and further increased to~1.5 and 2.2 g/g when tempered to 23% moisture and heated to 115 and 130°C. Higher values of WHC seen for the hull-less barley relative to the Desi chickpeas are thought to be associated with its higher amount of starches and more gelatinized starch as well as the beta-glucan that can absorb water (Aguilera et al, 2009).…”
Section: Water Hydration Capacitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This change in structure is also reflected indirectly by a positive correlation with surface charge (r = .721, p < .01) and a negative correlation with solubility (r = À.947, p > .001) in the case of chickpea flour (Table 3). Pathiratne et al (2015) also reported that the water holding capacity of lentil flour increased from~0.8 to~0.9 and 1.0 g/g when tempered to 15% moisture and infrared heated to 115 and 130°C, and further increased to~1.5 and 2.2 g/g when tempered to 23% moisture and heated to 115 and 130°C. Higher values of WHC seen for the hull-less barley relative to the Desi chickpeas are thought to be associated with its higher amount of starches and more gelatinized starch as well as the beta-glucan that can absorb water (Aguilera et al, 2009).…”
Section: Water Hydration Capacitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A more significant heat-induced protein solubility reduction after tempering has been reported. Pathiratne et al (2015) reported the protein dispersibility index for lentil flour decreased with increasing infrared heating temperature from 115 to 165°C and increasing moisture levels from 8% to 23%. Arntfield et al (1997) reported lentil flour with higher levels of moisture during infrared heating to be more susceptible to protein denaturation and aggregation.…”
Section: Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Micronization of green lentil (var. Eston) above 130 °C and moisture tempering (16% and 23% from 8%) resulted in higher water holding capacity and oil absorption capacity of the roller‐milled flours and did not affect the total protein or ash content (Pathiratne, Shand, Pickard, & Wanasundara, ). Micronization of lentil tempered to higher moisture contents led to slight seed darkening (reduced lightness values) as compared to lower moisture levels (Arntfield et al., ), and to more rapid water uptake (Scanlon et al., ).…”
Section: Grain Legumes Entering the Millmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kidney beans from Canada showed a 6.3% decrease in tannin, whereas Egyptian kidney beans had an 82.5% reduction (Table IV). In lentils, a high micronizing temperature of 165°C reduced the TI activity from 1.3 trypsin inhibitor units (TIU)/mg of protein in raw lentil flour to 0.8 TIU/mg of protein in micronized flour (34.8% loss) at 16% moisture and to 0.6 TIU/mg of protein in micronized flour (53.8% loss) in flours tempered to 23% moisture (Pathiratne et al 2015). In lentils, a high micronizing temperature of 165°C reduced the TI activity from 1.3 trypsin inhibitor units (TIU)/mg of protein in raw lentil flour to 0.8 TIU/mg of protein in micronized flour (34.8% loss) at 16% moisture and to 0.6 TIU/mg of protein in micronized flour (53.8% loss) in flours tempered to 23% moisture (Pathiratne et al 2015).…”
Section: Micronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%